• GrymEdm@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I actually had trouble finding that out (although I only looked for like, 15 minutes). It’s apparently difficult to determine according to some tech websites. I do have this chart that says since 2017 YouTube ad revenue has been 7-11% of Google’s global revenue but I don’t know if that = profit. Decided to meme anyways because I have ads blocked on PC but still see them on my phone.

      • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hosting a streaming service is incredibly expensive. Especially at the scale of YouTube. I can imagine YouTube is costing far more for Google than Search itself.

        My guess is that YouTube has never really been profitable, which is why they’re pushing users to buy Premium.

      • TxzK@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        “I have ads blocked on PC but still see them on my phone.”

        If you’re on Android, ReVanced. And if you’re on iOS, well get fucked or something, idk

      • splonglo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Youtube has always claimed that it doesn’t turn a profit but I don’t believe them. My reasoning is that if the server costs are more than the revenue today, then they’re going to be worse tomorrow. A gorillian gigabytes of data are uploaded to that thing every nanosecond. A company can’t get exponentially less profitable every second and still survive. And what else is there to prop it up? Google ad results? No way is Youtube not profitable. They’re saying that to avoid tax.

    • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Given the tech turnover rate at google (the rate at which they kill products) the answer is most probably yes.