• theonyltruemupf@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nuclear power is expensive and slow to build. Wind and solar are much, much cheaper and quicker.

    • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      They already had it and it was working just fine. They tore it down and went full coal and some gas. Now wind and solar are taking over slowly, but it’s been years with more pollution and more radiation than any already working nuclear plant would have emmited.

    • discount_door_garlic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      this ignores the key issue that in Germany, there was already an extensive and perfectly functional nuclear industry. In other countries with no nuclear infrastructure, renewables are definitely the better, cheaper, more scalable choice - but countries which invested big many decades ago are in a different position, and Germany’s deliberate destruction of their nuclear capabilities has left them dependant on fossil fuels from an adversarial state - easily a worse situation than small amounts of carefully managed nuclear waste while renewables were scaled up.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Nuclear is only expensive and slow if you’re building reactors from 1960-s. Modern micro- and nano-reactors can be put in every yard in a matter of months if not weeks.