• Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    When I was young my parents introduced me to some old school Communists; folks who’d fought in the Spanish Civil War and been blacklisted in the 1950s.

    One of the stories they told was that back in 1968 the oldtimers were warning people to vote for Hubert Humphrey because they knew how bad Nixon would be, Too many young folks then thought ‘both sides are the same.’

    • LennethAegis@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t know much about him, but reading that he lost the young people vote for supporting the Vietnam War is such a good parallel for today.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        LBJ realized he’d made a giant mistake and hoped Humphrey could end the War. Nixon ran as a ‘peace’ candidate and made things much worse.

        Trump’s people would nuke the entire Middle East hoping to bring about the Rapture.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          At what point does Biden realize he’s made a giant mistake? You’re lecturing us for not paying attention to history. Is Biden?

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Turn it around.

            Can you lay out a detailed plan showing Biden exactly what to do? Something that covers not just the Palestinians and the Israelis, but alos the iranians, the sryians, the russians, the Saudis, and all the other interested and highly armed parties in the region?

            I have no idea how to restart a problem that’s been formenting since 1948, do you?

              • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                If you think it’s that simple, you probably believed Trump was going to get Mexico to pay for the Wall.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  You asked me a question and I answered it. Are you going to answer my question now?

                  At what point does Biden realize he’s made a giant mistake? You’re lecturing us for not paying attention to history. Is Biden?

                  Or hell, let me ask you. Given the choice between supporting Israel or Biden winning the election which would you choose?

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    there is an understandable wave of nihilism manifesting in the younger generations that will probably persist for as long as they live. i don’t imagine the united states will stop producing nihilists for a long time as the circumstances are not projected to change

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Or maybe people are overestimating his survivability in the hardest job in the planet. My prediction is no matter the victor, by January of 2029, the outgoing president will neither be Trump or Biden.

  • daltotron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    okay real question for the omega libs here: where do you see people that are like. worth taking seriously, right, that are worth engaging with (maybe that’s the major filter that I’m blocking out here since most people seem incapable of choosing who they actually want to engage with), who are the people that are worth engaging with that aren’t going to vote for the old zionist rapist guy? I mean, the democractic one? I’m pulling your chain there but like for real, where do you see the opposition that’s actually real?

    Most of the shit that I’ve seen, still, is like, people rightfully saying “oh, biden sucks, here’s why”, and then people bringing up “trump’s worse”. Like okay, just because I hate pancakes doesn’t mean I suddenly love waffles, you know? Food analogy I know I know, but really, like, where’s the real opposition coming from? I’m discounting the super pro-biden turbolibs also, because they annoy me with their smugness. So far as I can tell, the people who are fervently anti-biden to the point of like, idiocy, right, weren’t going to vote for him basically in any context, regardless of you know like damage control strategies, or the fact that voting didn’t take that much effort in totality compared to other activism they might do, or like, oh, could they vote as a protest in a non-swing state that’s basically guaranteed commitment to biden already as a kind of protest vote with questionable utility, that sort of thing. Most of the “opposition” I’ve seen hasn’t been actually calculated about any of that, because none of that stuff is really very controversial, or, it shouldn’t be. Most of them have just been like, not worth bothering with. Probably not russian bots or trolls like everyone would constantly say, because that’s also fucking idiotic, but probably, they’re just stupid people who aren’t worth wasting your time on.

    Basically why the fuck is everyone wasting their time on this like, stupid bullshit? How come every election, in equal measure, I see “vote blue no matter who” imbeciles trotted out in lock step, to shout down at “I will never vote for anyone because I’m a posadist accelerationist” terminally online idiots? There’s no nuance or real depth to the conversation, or strategy, it’s just like. Both sides can construct a strawman, and then basically get away with it because, on the vastness of the internet, said strawman is guaranteed to exist, especially if I make it kind of a vague ghost that I’m punching at. And then because of that, nobody ever has to actually like, work out any of their arguments in depth, because they’re too busy kind of churning forth the cycle of idiocy.

    I dunno, maybe digg 3.0 is just not conducive to good political discourse.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’ve been round and round with the same folks who your post is directed at, and the conclusion I’ve drawn is “our government sucks, this is the best we can do, get used to it.”

      American history is littered with horrible actions. It’s not unreasonable to expect us to keep doing it. Our government was written to be undemocratic at the request of slaveholders. Even if we had a card-carrying capital-C Communist™ as president, there are massive mechanisms that would prevent them from achieving fundamental change.

      Joe Biden is literally the best we can do. This craphole of a country that shoots children protesting the killing of other children is literally the best we can do.

      It’s a lot less stressful to just accept this.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a lot less stressful to just accept this.

        I wonder if that’s why suicide rates are at all time highs.

      • daltotron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        yeah I dunno if I can though. I think probably if this is the best we can do then we’re headed down both a full-throated fascist reality of constant genocide, poverty, oppression, not only here but globally as america serves those ends globally, and basically a dystopian climate apocalypse on top of that.

        If I accept that, then I become a little bit suicidal, which is not allowed.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Young people? How about Democrat party leadership? If you need certain people to vote for you, then you have to earn their votes! How is this so hard to understand?

    • fosho@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      because that attitude only helps the objectively more horrible politicians. how is this so hard to understand?

        • fosho@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          stakes are far too high to have the luxury of this brain dead take.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Stakes are so high, but Dem leadership believes that supporting a genocide is more important than winning an election? Talk about brain dead.

            • fosho@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              how about refusing to acknowledge that repubs would do the same or worse with this situation? no sane person thinks the situation is great. but brain dead is making a voting issue out of this when it isn’t one.

              • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m trying to convince essentially one guy to stop supporting genocide. People like you have the unenviable task of convincing millions of people to vote for a guy who currently supports genocide. The election isn’t happening tomorrow, why don’t you put your efforts into convincing your party leaders to adopt saner positions rather than bullying people who are genuinely and rightly outraged at what our country is and isn’t doing in regards to it’s support of Israel?

  • digital_alchemist@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Balance:

    a) damage done by another Trump presidency

    vs

    b) damage done by demonstrating to the ruling class that you’ll give them whatever they want so long as you genuinely fear one of the candidates

    Tough call. I wish each and every one of you who has a say in this clairvoyance beyond mine.

    • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The fact you phrase it as though that’s an actual question is terrifying. You’re comparing someone who wants to LITERALLY be a dictator and never have an election again, to someone who isn’t willing to fully embrace every last left-wing policy you demand.

      The “ruling class” didn’t dictate Bernie not getting the Democratic nomination, people voting in primaries did. Do you know which group of people overwhelmingly don’t vote in primaries? The same 20-somethings bitching about Biden being the “only other option”. Get the fuck out of here with your “demonstrating to the ruling class” - you had your opportunity to show up and overwhelm the primaries and chose not to. The “ruling class” don’t have the numbers to determine a primary, and if you choose to watch their commercials and buy into it, that’s on you. But hey, if a bunch of people think like you’ll they’ll find out what actually living in a dictatorship is like. And no, Canada isn’t just going to welcome you with open arms when the world starts burning down around you so I hope you’ve got an exit strategy.

      • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        What primaries are you talking about? The ones 4 years ago?

        What choice were Democrats given for primaries this election cycle?

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, there is a very simple solution to this. The Democrats could actually be a progressive party that recognizes and protects human rights, international law, and basic humanity of its American people.

      But they don’t. They continue to aid a genocide. They continue to obstruct justice on an international level. They continue the racist policies of Trumps like interment camps at the southern borders and building “the wall”. They continue to protect the interest of rich elites against the American people like denying universal healthcare and basic social security for all.

      The Democrats would rather have Trump win, than have the US not be a violent rogue nation internationally and a far-right economics hellhole internally.

      Now they decided to crack down on free speech together with the Republicans, instead of taking the young peoples protests seriously. They are fine with Trump. For them Trump is better than universal healthcare or upholding international laws, like not committing mass murder.

      • Dinsmore@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        In addition, Democrats do everything possible to make sure nobody left of center wins the Democratic nomination: when there was a real challenge to the corporate Democrats (Bernie in 2016 and 2020), they did everything they could to rig the primary process in order to keep out any leftward movement. Similarly for 2024, instead of holding debates to convince Democrats that Joe Biden was still up to the task, they held no debates and even canceled the primaries in several states. In 2020, polling showed that Bernie would have a much more comfortable path to victory than Biden, but Democrats were more comfortable with Trump than Bernie.