• Rabbit R1 AI box is actually an Android app in a limited $200 box, running on AOSP without Google Play.
  • Rabbit Inc. is unhappy about details of its tech stack being public, threatening action against unauthorized emulators.
  • AOSP is a logical choice for mobile hardware as it provides essential functionalities without the need for Google Play.
  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t even understand what the point is of this product. Seems like e-waste at first glance.

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    lmao threatening action against their own imminent irrelevance, more like

    Not cool guys, not cool at all

    And get serious - fuck your “proprietary” details, fuck lying/misrepresentation for money, and fuck you for trying a stunt like this.

    Call me when you actually put the genie in the bottle!

  • 0x2d@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    their page to link accounts to it was not a real webapp, it was a novnc page that would connect to an ubuntu vm that runs chrome with no sandboxing and basic password store under fluxbox wm

    someone dumped the home directory from it

    • cheet@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Holy shit, that’s actually hilarious, I imagine someone would have noticed when their paste/auto type password managers didn’t work

      For those confused, this sounds like instead of making a real website, they spin up a vm, embed a remote desktop tool into their website and have you login through chrome running on their VM, this is sooooo sketch it, its unreal anyone would use this in a public product.

      Imagine if to sign into facebook from an app, you had to go to someone else’s computer, login and save your credentials on their PC, would that be a good idea?

      • brotkel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        What I don’t understand is why. This sounds like way more work than spinning up some out-of-the-box framework with oAuth or a Google login and hosting it on Lambda or Azure. What is logging in on a VM box even going to do for the device?

        • Ramenator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve looked it up and it’s even uglier and I can kinda understand why they did it this way Basically, for their “integrations” they aren’t using any official APIs. Instead they just use the websites and automate them via the Playwright framework. So for each user they have a VM running with a Chrome browser to access the services. So now they have the problem that they need to get their users session cookies into the browser. And the easiest solution for that is having the users access their VM via VNC and just log into the automated browser.
          This is such a hacky solution that I’m actually in awe of it’s shittiness. That’s something you throw together in an all-nighter during a Hackathon, not a production ready solution

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s so weird how they’re just insisting it isn’t an android app even though people have proven it is. Who do they expect to believe them?

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The same question was asked a million times during the crypto boom. “They’re insisting that [some-crypto-project] is a safe passive income when people have proven that it’s a ponzi scheme. Who do they expect to believe them?” And the answer is, zealots who made crypto (or in this case, AI) the basis of their entire personality.

    • Anamana@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They have thought of a specific design for the device using its own interaction modality and created a product that is more than just software.

      Therefore don’t get why people refer to it being just an app? Does it make it worth less, because it runs on Android? Many devices, e.g. e-readers are just Android Apps as well. If it works it works.

      In this case it doesn’t, so why not focus on that?

      • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The point being, they are charging 200 bucks for hardware that is superfluous and low end for an incomplete software experience that could be delivered without that on an app. The question is, are you going to give up your smartphone for this new device? Are you going to carry both? Probably not.

        “It can do 10% of the shit your phone can do, only slower, on a smaller screen, with its own data connection, and inaccurately because you have to hope that our “AI” is sufficiently advanced to understand a command, take action on that command, and respond in a short amount of time. And that’s not to even speak about the horrible privacy concerns or that it’s a brick without connection!”

        Everything about this project seems lackluster at best, other than maybe the aesthetic design from teenage engineering, but even then, their design work seems a bit repetitive. But that may be due to how the company is asking for the work. “We wanna be like Nothing and Playdate!!” “I gotchu fam!”

        To address your point about e-readers, they have specific use cases. Long battery lives, large, efficient e-ink displays, and the convenience of having all your books, or a large subset, available to you offline! But when those things aren’t a concern, yea, an app will do.

        Like with most contemporary product launches, I simply find myself asking, “Who is this for?”

        • Anamana@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s an experimental device and by buying it you invest into r&d. It’s not meant to replace a smartphone as of now, but similar ones eventually will.

          My point stands, because they are offering a completely new (but obv lacking) experience with novel design solutions. What they made is a toy, which is not really unusual for teenage engineering. But if they do as they did with other devices in the past this thing might actually rock in the future. They are not inexperienced and usually over super long support for their devices.

          TE is way older than Nothing and Playdate btw…

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ubuntu is just a bunch of apps running on Debian! Did you know you can take Ubuntu app .deb files and run them on Debian?

    Look. The R1 is stupid, but this isn’t the reason why.

    • SereneHurricane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The difference here is Ubuntu is open about the fact that stand on the shoulders of something greater than them.

      R1 in contrast pretend that everything they’ve built is proprietary, and therefore no one could possibly come up with something similar.

      When it’s clearly not the case.

      This is critical, not for the purpose of sales, but for the purpose of retaining investor value.

      The whole thing reeks of an exercise to generate artificial investor value.

      If investors find out that their so-called innovation can actually be done by anyone with some coding skills and connectivity to open AI, then the company value will drop like a hot turd.