• return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Climate protesters have expressed concerns about Tesla’s plans, which entail cutting down approximately 250 acres of forest in a rural community of fewer than 8,000 residents near a nature conservation area.

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Should be noted that basically all of that forest is a tree farm monoculture.

      Now they moved to protesting the water usage of the factory, which is high, but quite low compared to other industries and farms in the area.

      I mean, fuck cars in general, but protests that focus on bullshit facts are not helping the cause.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The water usage is a huge issue. The region has suffered a severe drought from 2018-2022. There is some issues with a chemical bubble in the ground that require a careful and coordinated pumping by all water utilities and well operators in the area to not suck it into the aquifer.One water utility had to deny all building permits for new houses, schools, businesses because Teslas water consumption capped the legally and sustainably permittable water extraction in the area.

        There was a huge shitshow around the permits Tesla gained with direct political interference from the state government to overlook legal requirements in particular in the context of water. Tesla is fighting to deny access for the water utility to the chemical analysis of the water they extract at their wells.

        There is a risk that Tesla could permanently destroy the water supply for hundreds of thousands of people if they are not made to observe the legal requirements and cooperate with other stakeholders for water in the region.