• Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, pretty much. Philosophy people can be helpful though, their idea processing systems are fairly robust, and unlike a statistician or scientist, they sort of end up with a side-specialization in communication. Which is extremely valuable these days.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The problem with philosophy in terms of understanding the bigger questions in life is that advanced physics has answered many questions that were previously in the realm of philosophy, and you can’t really understand what’s possible in reality / what constraints there are on abstract philosophy without understanding advanced physics.

      Of course the problem with advanced physics is that it takes so much time and effort to learn and understand thoroughly that you often end up as a not great communicator to the average person.

      Or, to be cheeky: physics aims to take the largest and most complicated concepts in the universe and explain them in the simplest possible language, and philosophy is the opposite.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t think a philosophers job is to answer questions as much as formulate and ask them proficiently.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Philosophers literally invented formal logic to help them answer questions. Yes they are trying to answer questions and constrain the possible answer space where they can’t.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Certainly, but that was before the scientific method rose to prominence. Things change, and that can include the purpose of any given practice.

      • aleph@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s true if you’re only talking about what was once called ‘natural philosophy’, but there are still many areas where philosophy and physics don’t really overlap - ethics, epistemology, aesthetics, language, existentialism, etc.

  • jaycifer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    One of my philosophy professors described philosophy as a bunch of people trying to convince themselves they’re not nuts.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Philosophy being reduced to only pondering about existential questions is a tragedy of misrepresentation. Philosophy is the study of thinking, and that covers a very wide range of topics.

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was gonna say this.

      Existentialism is kinda boring IMO. But the philosophy of language, knowledge, and ethics are all super interesting.