• Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Git is not a blockchain. Most importantly, it’s not distributed. There’s a singular git server that all git clients for that repository connect to and use as a source of truth.

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That is patently false. It was developed to help develop the Linux kernel, which famously has multiple decentralized repositories managed by different maintainers.

      The fact that most companies use it in a way you describe, with only one central repository, does not mean that git is not distributed.

      • _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        For each project there is one authoritative instance, one “server” that everyone pushes to. Otherwise you get chaos.

        • Thann@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          And nobody ever forked a project, and lived happily ever after, then end.

          • _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you want to work with the original project, you have to push to the server that controls the original project.

            • Thann@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              No you don’t, you can just fork it, add a commit, and walk away, and everyone can decide which one they want to clone

        • perishthethought@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That may be how you use it, but that’s not baked into git. See my previous response. There’s a bunch of FUD in this thread for some reason.

        • Asyx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s not a git thing though. You can totally have multiple remotes and the remotes are just git repositories themselves. Git is 100% decentralized. There is technically nothing stopping you from having multiple remotes.