• BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh god, please replace it faster.

    I am so tired of all the random shit that only RedHat does because RedHat had a minor issue with something that they blew completely out of the water and decided to fix by just making a brand new thing that only they use, and it’s kinda compatible with whatever it replaced, but no, not in these hundred different specific ways that will definitely come up every time you need it to do something, but will work just long enough to make you think whatever you’re doing might be feasible.

    I would love to never look at RedHat again.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t think it is going to really replace it. Companies are much more likely to move to Rocky Linux or Debian.

    Suse has the best music though

  • Kissaki@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    German-based SUSE just extended long-term support for Linux Enterprise 15 until July 2037. […] 13 years from now […] that’s […] 19 years after 2018, which is when Linux Enterprise 15 was first released.

    pretty good

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      A lot of companies have been making it a goal to move away from Oracle as a whole. The Java enterprise licensing thing from a few years back rubbed every company in the world the wrong way, their rep is permanently trashed.

      • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The ongoing java licensing thing. They just changed their licensing terms to where you have to license every computer in your company if 1 computer needs java. And they are going around shaking down companies who are unknowingly using java.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I cannot speak for smaller firms because we only deal with enterprise level projects. What we have seen and continue to see is that if the demands of the project are light enough to run on the cloud, then the company will do that (Azure is kicking everyone’s ass in sales BTW). Anyone else, which is the majority or pur clients (and they don’t like hearing it) are stuck with Oracle. Sure, you can off-load a lot of functionality to other things, but for RDBMS you are stuck with the big red ⭕.

        • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not gonna dox myself, but my company is definitely not a smaller firm, whatever country you’re in, good chance we at least have a presence. Our drive to eliminate Oracle dependence extends to just… not doing whatever that was at all anymore. We’re not there yet and it’s going to take even more years, but I’ve heard the same from quite a few others at similarly large companies.

          You’re right that Oracle is in a real good place technically in a lot of ways, but people are very very motivated to see them fail and that drive has even spread outside of the IT sphere.

          • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Amen. Oracle has made us buckets of cash but dear lord are they awful. IT will be better once they are gone.