Coming from a district court, I think this ruling could be appealed, but it’s welcome news nevertheless.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s still an excellent idea to power off your phone whenever you are in the vicinity of a border guard and never voluntarily unlock it anywhere close to the border. You can’t (generally) be compelled to unlock your phone but you absolutely can have an unlocked phone grabbed out of your hands by a border guard with no legal right to lock it.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is important - power OFF your phone. Your phone is more secure before you unlock it for the first time after booting. Use a strong password as well.

    • leds@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      never voluntarily unlock it anywhere close to the border.

      Isn’t that defined as 100 mile from the border (including international airports)

      • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I believe it’s 100 miles from the border including coastlines but does not include a 100 mile radius around international airports. I don’t remember the source but Ive seen a map that represented it that way.

        Also worth noting, this ruling only benefits citizens in that specific district, as other districts aren’t bound by its rulings. Personally I’d recommend having a 2nd device you can use to record your interactions because if they violate your rights your chances of getting their body cam video of it aren’t great.