• entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        2 months ago

        This article is from the New York Times, a prominent US newspaper which writes primarily for a US audience. It’s relevant for them to bring it up.

      • TitanLaGrange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        FTA:

        The so-called plug-in systems involve routing the direct current generated by the panels to an inverter, which converts it to an alternating current. They can then be plugged into a conventional wall socket to feed power to a home.

        So, yeah, almost certainly illegal in pretty much any grid-powered home in the US.

        The basic problem is that if the grid power goes down the inverter can back-feed the grid enough to electrocute the people who are working to fix it.

        Utilities require an approved isolation system of some kind that prevents that happening. They are pretty strict about this for various other technical and political reasons too, but evidently it is mostly a safety concern.

        I’ve got some good locations at home for panels, and about 500W in panels that I use for camping, but the equipment I’d need to handle easily and safely consuming the power at home is kind of expensive (just running an inverter and a battery for an isolated system is easy enough, I’ve got all that, but it’s not cheap to seamlessly connect it to my home power system). Would love to have a safe and approved system like what is described in the article.

        • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 months ago

          Houses in Europe are connected to the grid too.

          These systems are approved in Europe by utilities because they have failsafes implemented to prevent back feeding electricity in the grid.

          The fact that these systems are still illegal in the US is a political issue, not a technical one.

        • 31ank@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          Balcony solars are not able to back feed since they need the grid to synchronize, if you want one that is able to work in “island mode” you still need approval from the grid provider/one that isnt connected with the schuko connector.

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, because you can kill a lineman working on the downed line, who mistakenly thinks the line is dead and has no idea that you’re feeding power into it from your solar panel.

        • Zahille7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I really feel like one of these store-bought solar panels wouldn’t put out enough electricity to kill someone

          • 31ank@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            They have enough energy, but they automatically turn off once the grid goes down because they need the grid to synchronize. Balcony solar panels are not able to work in “island mode”, so no lineman is at risk.

          • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            You really don’t need a lot of power to kill someone, especially with AC you really don’t need much to induce ventricular fibrillation.