• istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Signal’s hostility to third party clients is a huge red flag.

    They also refuse to distance themselves from Google’s app store.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do you hate Signal or do you hate the west? There legitimate reasons to not like Signal but calling them hostile toward third party clients is untrue. Last time I checked Signal wasn’t proprietary.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They have demonstrated history of asking third party clients to not use the signal name, and not use the signal network. The client that currently exists that do this do it against the wishes of the signal foundation

    • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s outdated information:

      Go forth and contribute, fork, or create your own.

      They also refuse to distance themselves from Google’s app store.

      This link has existed forever at this point if we count in internet years: https://signal.org/android/apk/ - getting an app directly from the developer with no middleman is about as distant as you can get from Google’s app store.

      • misaloun@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Signal actually has a rule on not using third party clients on its servers. These clients existing do not prove the point you intend.

      • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Those clients exist despite Signal Foundation, not because they encourage community development. They are doing everything they can to discourage third party app development.