• istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Signal’s hostility to third party clients is a huge red flag.

    They also refuse to distance themselves from Google’s app store.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Do you hate Signal or do you hate the west? There legitimate reasons to not like Signal but calling them hostile toward third party clients is untrue. Last time I checked Signal wasn’t proprietary.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        They have demonstrated history of asking third party clients to not use the signal name, and not use the signal network. The client that currently exists that do this do it against the wishes of the signal foundation

    • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      That’s outdated information:

      Go forth and contribute, fork, or create your own.

      They also refuse to distance themselves from Google’s app store.

      This link has existed forever at this point if we count in internet years: https://signal.org/android/apk/ - getting an app directly from the developer with no middleman is about as distant as you can get from Google’s app store.

      • misaloun@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Signal actually has a rule on not using third party clients on its servers. These clients existing do not prove the point you intend.

      • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Those clients exist despite Signal Foundation, not because they encourage community development. They are doing everything they can to discourage third party app development.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Signal is compleletly compromised through spell check on 99% of OEM smart devices. Spell check can see what your typing word by word, and signal uses it. Feds are 100% using spell check to view your private messages. And by feds I mean every government on earth with a computer.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      I find it intriguing that the people will scrutinize messaging platforms such as Telegram, and explain in detail how one should not entrust their messages’ encryption keys to these services. Yet, these same people seem unable to comprehend the concerns regarding Signal server having access to phone numbers of its users. The fact that these people are able to perceive potential vulnerabilities in one platform while remaining oblivious to similar concerns on another highlights that their arguments are more ideological than rational.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Not that the action against Telegram is right, but there’s a big difference between what Signal and Telegram is doing.

      • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Telegram is available on F-Droid. Signal is not. Whatever is Signal doing, it’s pretty bad.

        • toasteecup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Are you developing your opinions based on vibes or have you actually audited their software yourself (you are free to do so both client and federation server code)?

          If you audited it, have you produced an actual report with metrics and points of reference for your data points?

        • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Assuming you’ve audited Signal, can you tell us what your findings were and why you think Signal must be up to something pretty bad? I’m very curious and would love to be enlightened by someone as knowledgeable as you.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            I’ll leave it up to you to decide if that is bad or not, but one of the reasons the Signal app can’t be put unaltered on F-droid is because it loads in external dependencies from Google at run-time, which can also be altered by Google at will with any Android update.

            • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              How significant is it that the server code is open-source or not? It’s possible for Signal to publish their server code while running completely different software on their servers. The point of the client is being open source and audited on a regular basis by the community, which is why it doesn’t make sense to trust the server-side software.

              The entire point is that we don’t have to trust the sever at all. The client is open source and regularly audited by the community. As long as the client stays fully open source, everything’s fine. Also, the closed source dependencies are part of a spam reduction effort which IMO is well worth it. Prior to this, Signal had a spam problem and the client itself remains fully open source.

              Signal could have very well not even told people that they added a closed source dependency on Google to its servers and just lied by publishing fake server code that omits the closed source dependency., but instead they were very transparent about the spam problem. In terms of they “why?” regarding the closed source dependencies, their argument is that making it open source would almost immediately result in all anti-spam measures being thwarted. Frankly I’m inclined to agree and again, as long as the client is fully open source and regularly audited, the server code is irrelevant to user privacy/security.

              https://community.signalusers.org/t/spam-scam-on-signal/26665

              https://signal.org/blog/keeping-spam-off-signal/

              • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                22 days ago

                The external Google dependencies I am talking about are loaded into the client not the server, so that’s an entirely different issue.

                • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  Every app from the Play store requires GCM though, and Signal functions even if a user disables GCM. It pertains to a phone’s ability to notify a user of a new message. But again, users can disable GCM and the app itself will continue to work just fine.

                  For what it’s work, the APK on Signal’s website (obviously) doesn’t have the external Google dependencies. Personally, I really don’t see this as an issue at all.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Would you have more info on the differences? I was wondering the same thing, but I don’t know enough about Telegram to compare

        • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Signal always responds to authorities when they ask for data, and they give them all they have: the day they registered, their phone number and the timestamp they last used the app.

          Telegram has unencrypted channels of drug dealing, and what I heard is a lot of illegal porn too. The authorities want information on certain users there and Telegram doesn’t comply. This is directly against the law Signal is not breaking, because they always send all the data they have to the law enforcement.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            while not wrong context matters, US social media companies also enable human, weapons, and drug trafficking. they play a role in a few genocides too.

            but the western regime does not care.

            • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              But they give their data when the officials ask. That is all that matters. And I seriously hope none of us uses Telegram or WhatsApp to any discussions. Use Signal because that is so far pretty unbreakable.

              Telegram is already in the hands of that tiny Russian old man and WhatsApp is owned by a lizard.

  • perestroika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    As a happy user of Signal (no bugs or incidents from my viewpoint), I regardless chime in to say a word for decentralization. :)

    Signal is centralized:

    • there is a single Signal implementation, with a single developing entity
    • you have to install its mobile version before you may run the desktop version

    There exist protocols like Tox which go a step beyond Signal and offer more freedom -> have multiple clients from diverse makers (some of them unstable), don’t have centralized registration, and don’t rely on servers to distribute messages - only to distribute contact information.

    In the grand comparison table of protocols (not clients), Tox is among the few lines that’s all green (Signal has one red square).

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Yeah, Signal is more than encrypted messaging it’s a metadata harvesting platform. It collects phone numbers of its users, which can be used to identify people making it a data collection tool that resides on a central server in the US. By cross-referencing these identities with data from other companies like Google or Meta, the government can create a comprehensive picture of people’s connections and affiliations.

    This allows identifying people of interest and building detailed graphs of their relationships. Signal may seem like an innocuous messaging app on the surface, but it cold easily play a crucial role in government data collection efforts.

    Also worth of note that it was originally funded by CIA cutout Open Technology Fund, part of Radio Free Asia. Its Chairwoman is Katherine Maher, who worked for NDI/NED: regime-change groups, and a member of Atlantic Council, WEF, US State Department Foreign Affairs Policy Board etc.

    • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      This message is definitely giving all the vibes of a disinformation/misinformation attempt. There is no metadata to harvest from signal.

      Here is an example of all the extent of data that signal has on any given user: https://signal.org/bigbrother/cd-california-grand-jury/

      It involves phone number, account creation time and last connected time. That’s it. Nothing more.

      The cross referencing of data is just nonsense. Google and meta already have your phone number. Adding signal info to it adds absolutely zero information to them. They have it all already. They know nothing of who you talk with, which groups you are part of.

      The funding of Signal did involve public grants but that’s not anything bad. Many projects and nonprofits receive public money. It does not imply that there are backdoors or anything like that. And signal was purposefully designed so that no matter who owns and operates it, the messages stay hidden independently on the server infrastructure. They did the best possible to remove themselves from the chain of trust. Expert cryptographers and auditors trust signal. Don’t listen to this random ramble of an online stranger whose intentions are just to confuse you and make you doubt.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        It’s fascinating that these kinds of trolls come out of the woodwork any time obvious problems with Signal are brought up.

        Phone numbers very obvious are metadata. If you think that cross referencing data is nonsense then you have absolutely no clue what you’re talking about. It’s not about Google or Meta having your phone number, it’s about having a graph of people doing encrypted communication with each other over Signal. The graph of contacts is what’s valuable.

        Don’t listen to this random ramble of an online stranger whose intentions are just to confuse you and make you doubt.

        What you absolutely shouldn’t listen to are trolls who tell you to just trust that Signal is not abusing the data it’s collecting about you. The first rule of security is that it can’t be faith based.

        • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          What are you talking about? you get a phone number from signal, and what will you be able to derive from it? there is no graph. signal does not hold any “relationships” information.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Its the tankies.

        Honestly if they can recommend something better I’m all for it but I haven’t heard anything.

        • Majestic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Take a look here for some alternatives:

          https://dessalines.github.io/essays/why_not_signal.html#good-alternatives

          • Matrix
          • XMPP
          • Briar
          • SimpleX

          Also just because there are no alternatives doesn’t mean your default position should be we just have to trust whatever exists now because it’s good enough. Or that we can’t criticize it ruthlessly, distrust it. Call it out and as a result of that build perhaps the desire for something better, a fix as it were.

          The evidence and history clearly points towards Signal being very suspicious and likely in bed with the feds. This is not conspiracy thinking. Conspiracy thinking is thinking that the country/empire that gave away old German engima machines whose code they’d cracked to developing countries without telling them they’d cracked it in the late 40s/early 50s, that went on to establish a crypto company just to subvert its encryption. That’s done everything Snowden revealed has in fact changed suddenly for the first time in half a century for no particular reason and not to its own benefit. That’s fanciful thinking. That’s a leap of logic away from the proven trends, the pattern of behavior, and indeed the incentivizes to continue using their dominant position to maintain dominance and power. They didn’t back down on the clipper chip because they just gave up and decided to let people have privacy and rights. They gave up on it because they found better ways of achieving the same results with plausible deniability.

          Also why is everything “tankies” with you people. Privacy advocates point out the obvious and suddenly it’s a communist conspiracy. LOL

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago
            • Matrix and XMPP are not alternatives and are worse for privacy and security

            • Simplex Chat is actually is pretty sold but isn’t the most user friendly

            • Briar is very cool but its complexity makes it hard to use. It also has problems with real time communications

            • BeeDemocracy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              21 days ago

              Matrix and XMPP are not alternatives and are worse for privacy and security

              XMPP is exactly as good or bad for privacy as the servers and clients you choose. It’s a protocol, not a service. Unlike Signal, which is a brand/app/service package.

                • BeeDemocracy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  15 days ago

                  The protocol is worse for privacy

                  ‘Trust me bro’

                  The problem is, you’re comparing apples with orchards. Analogous would be: ‘email is worse for privacy than yahoomail’. Plus in this scenario yahoomail only lets you send emails to yahoomail addresses.