My mom is in assisted living and I have a suspicion that the staff, or perhaps a resident, is taking her money. I need something that won’t look out of place and isn’t easily disabled, maybe it plays possum when unplugged but has battery backup. Anyone have any advice?

  • ChexMax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Did you Google this? They have cameras that look like phone chargers. Also, install a non hidden camera and a hidden one.

  • Mayor Poopington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Im curious what you mean by “plays possum”. Because if it doesn’t have a battery backup it wont work very well unplugged. Been looking at cameras for the house lately, and have yet to find one that flips over and sticks its legs in the air when unplugged.

  • BigLime@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    My middle school used alarm clock cameras to spy on us. Cheap-o’s couldn’t be bothered to buy real cameras. I don’t have a link, but it’s just an idea

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Assuming you live in the United States, you need to be aware of the laws in the state you live in. Many states are one party consent when it comes to recording. Which means if you and I are having a conversation, you can record it without telling me. One party has consented.

    If on the other hand, you install a camera without your mom’s knowledge, then you are not one of the two parties. This “evidence” could be thrown out of court as it is “illegally aquired”.

    Not to say you shouldn’t do it. Protect your mom’s property. I would just suggest looking into the local laws about it. I am also not a lawyer so you should look into your local laws or consult a lawyer.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      IANAL, but I believe these laws cover audio recording only. OP shouldn’t have an issue if they use something that records video only.

      Think about it a second. I live in a two party consent state, but I see security & surveillance cameras everywhere. If two party consent was required for video then they wouldn’t be there.

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        The doorbell cameras that everyone have all record audio, in blatant violation of law, and they hand it over to police. I’m surprised there hasn’t been a court case to really slap those companies on the wrist.

        • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Outdoors are generally not protected by right to privacy, even if on private property.

          Someone standing in their own front lawn can be recorded with both video and audio without their consent.

          This is what makes it legal to record police.