The United States on September 13 said the Russian news outlet RT is taking orders directly from the Kremlin and working with Russian military intelligence to spread disinformation around the world to undermine democracies.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the United States has gathered new evidence that exposes cooperation between RT and four other subsidiaries of the Rossia Segodnya media group, and it intends to warn other countries of the threat of the disinformation.

In addition to RT, Rossia Segodnya operates RIA Novosti, TV-Novosti, Ruptly, and Sputnik, but the announcement on September 13 focused largely on RT. The outlet, formerly known as Russia Today, has previously been sanctioned for its work to allegedly spread Kremlin propaganda and disinformation.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Can we get a little deeper of a discussion as our top comment please? We used to be better than this…

      Most upvoted top 2/3rds of the thread are all repeats of the same ‘yeah no shit’.

      The remaining 1/3 is actual discussion…

      • Jumi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What is there to discuss? The article is just stating the obvious: that a news site called “Russia Today” is in cahoots with the Kremlin, the goverment of a country with state-controlled media and well-known influence on Western media.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Tactics on how to spot propaganda

          shared stories of propaganda sources exposed

          Little know practices of the putinbots for study purposes

          there’s a fucktonne of stuff that’s better than 35 renditions of ‘no shit sherlok’.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s like saying “Republican party working directly with Fox News, Breitbart, and OANN to spread disinformation”

      Yeah … No shit!

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s like saying “Republican party working directly with Fox News, Breitbart, and OANN to spread disinformation”

        Can’t be true. That’s just liberals being partisan. Fox is Fair and Balanced. It says do right there on the Chyron.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I’m old enough to remember when Glenn Beck and Eric Erikson had hour long programs on CNN.

            They were more than happy to mainline all sorts of bullshit, from “Iraq has WMDs” lies under Bush to Don Lemon’s insistence that a black hole from the LHC had eaten Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. MSNBC hyped “Lab Leak” theory around the COVID epidemic and has spent decades carrying water for the IDF.

            Don’t give these people a pass just because they’re not taking money directly from Rupert Murdoch. Cable News is full of reactionaries and nitwits.

            • Bizzle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’d give you a source, but I feel like your critical thinking skills are approximately that of a goldfish and I would therefore just be wasting my time.

              • Maeve@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes because terms like “unemployment” and “criminal” have static definitions.

  • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m genuinely confused as to what USA’s point is here. I mean they do this constantly. Are they saying it’s OK when USA does it but bad when anyone else does it?

    https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp90-00552r000201100005-4

    https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-covid-propaganda/

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/house-passes-16-billion-to-deliver-anti-china-propaganda-overseas/ar-AA1qp59U#:~:text=This legislation authorizes more than %241.6 billion for,the world that counter Chinese “malign influence” globally.

    I mean it sounds to me like they just don’t want competitors.

    *Edit: I just want to add, I think Russia should get out of Ukraine and what they’re doing is awful. But USA complaining about propaganda from other countries is hilariously hypocritical.

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No you see it’s different when RFA/RFE/RL/VOA, a CIA creation, under the wing of the State Department exist because…

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Imo, it’s different. When your own government is heavily invested in your nation’s citizens believing lies to prop up your own nation’s financial elites, individual or corporate, it’s especially egregious.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, we’re not new to information warfare, this stuff goes all the way back to the Cold War at least.

      The point is that its on, and since its on, it’s a question of do you want to win or lose.

      • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh that’s some wild whataboutism. It’s OK for USA to do it because everyone else does. Man that’s some awful way to think.

          • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            So yeah the head of a crime organization probably shouldn’t be pointing their fingers at other crime organizations. Just because crime exists historically doesn’t mean you should head a mafia group.

            • Carrolade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              This is exactly what a whataboutism is. Let’s take an axe murderer who murders people’s families. If another axe murderer goes and murders that guy’s family, would it be smart to just ignore it?

              The question isn’t what has been done in the past or who deserves what. It’s what should be done now?

              • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                You clearly do not understand whataboutism. It’s when someone uses someone else doing the same thing as an excuse. If Russia does it it’s OK for USA to do it. That’s whataboutism.

                And yes. Let the criminals kill themselves. That’s why USA doesn’t really do anything about gang wars.

                • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No, that is not a whataboutism in general, perhaps it’s your personal definition to just reverse it like that. This is whataboutism:

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

                  Note, my example was not an axe murderer murdering another axe murderer. It was murdering the axe murder’s family. Not him, his family. Siblings, children, cousins, aunts and uncles, you know. People related to you that aren’t actually you.

    • zante@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You’re not supposed to talk about that.

      The BBC is, has always been, state apparatus. Parts of its , especially the World Service, was set up to promote Britain around the world. It’s been fantastically successful. The Brits are masters.

      For the US, this week they were fed the news that China has raised the retirement age by 1 year, in order to pour scorn on it.

      No mention of the fact that the Chinese have on average been retiring 5-7 years earlier than Americans for many years.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s why I talk about it, and ask questions. It’s not appreciated, and people dismiss these conversations as not worth talking about. The consequences of not talking about core issues and focusing on identity politics are about to become very real.

        ETA; I had to look that up. Retirement age for men is going from 60 to 63 over a period of 15 years. We recently raised our own retirement age to 70, and we still don’t have universal health.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I remember when PBS showed RT regularly. I guess they were just doing it because it was international news coverage from a different perspective but the bias became quickly apparent when I watched it a few times. They only reported on negative stories from the United States and everything bad that happened in Russia was due to Western influence.