• UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 month ago

    I love how people are complaining about Wayland not being ready or being unstable (whatever that even means, because it’s a protocol), while it’s the default on both GNOME and Plasma now, which combined probably run on more than 50% of Linux desktops these days.

    And not only that, but Cinnamon, Xfce and others want to follow, so very clearly people who know a fair bit about desktops seem to disagree with Wayland being “not ready”.

    • Matty_r@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 month ago

      When people say its not ready, it’s normally some specific use case that worked in X11. So, they’re not wrong, but not right either.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        The devs have been working hard to hammer out those troublesome edge cases. There’s a lot less of them than there was a year or two ago.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wayland was subject to “first mover disadvantage” for a long time. Why be the first to switch and have to solve all the problems? Instead be last and everyone else will do the hard work for you.

      But without big players moving to it those issues never get fixed. And users rightly should not be forced to migrate to a broken system that isn’t ready. People just want a system that works right?

      Eventually someone had to decide it was ‘good enough’ and try an industry wide push to move away from a hybrid approach that wastes developer time and confuses users.