• jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    He’s supposed to be calming shit down before Trump takes office, not setting the stage for WW3. Fucking maniac

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, Biden need to set the stage for Trump to try to force Ukraine into surrendering its land to a murderous dictator so that the dictator can further his plans to take more land later gah.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m seeing a lot of comments taking this literally or saying why didn’t he do this before –

    You all realise this is a very powerful symbolic gesture, right? This is a diplomatic move, not a literal one. The president of the US would never strike at this time in this kind of proxy war, and this is the closest ‘fuck you’ he can issue at Russia (which, again, would not be said aloud).

    There’s nothing the US president could do to poke the Russian bear –other than escalate it to a hot war – other than this. This is an outgoing diplomatic move, and that is all.

  • credo@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I believe NYT makes you login, even on a gift link. Here is a TLDR:

    President Biden has authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to strike Russian and North Korean forces in Russia, a significant shift in U.S. policy. This decision comes in response to Russia’s introduction of North Korean troops into the conflict and their anticipated assault on Ukrainian forces in the Kursk region.

    The move reflects growing concerns over Ukraine’s ability to withstand simultaneous assaults while defending territory. The authorization aims to bolster Ukraine’s defense, target high-value military assets, and deter North Korean involvement. However, it has sparked debate among U.S. officials over escalation risks, as Russia might retaliate against the U.S. or its allies.

    President-elect Donald Trump, who has vowed to reduce U.S. support for Ukraine, is set to take office in two months, adding urgency to the decision. The Ukrainian strategy may include using captured Russian territory in Kursk as leverage in potential future negotiations. Meanwhile, the risk of Russian countermeasures remains a central concern for Biden’s administration and its allies.

    My take: I’ve been waiting on this since the US election. It’s sound strategy of we believe Putin won’t want to escalate with NATO before Trump takes office.

    • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I believe NYT makes you login, even on a gift link

      Requires javascript to be enabled. Fuck everything about that.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The other side of this is that once it’s allowed, Trump would have to take it away.

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    something about this seems kind of fucky. the time to do this was years ago. what is brandon’s calculation? that russia won’t do shit because their bitch is taking over? or is he finally convinced, somehow, that russia could never do shit in the first place?

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    wow. kudos for being the “now that it’s too late to have an impact, i’m going to do the thing i should have done many months ago” president

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Too late.

    Americans chose to abandon Ukraine when they elected Donald Trump and his Republican enablers.

    Russia will win, there will be one less democratic nation on the planet, Russia will expand their borders, and Europe/NATO will be threatened.

    Thanks conservatives, 3rd party voters, single issue voters, and non-voters. You really thought this one through.

    • Babalugats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What’s the issue you have with a non democratic country?

      I genuinely think most people (I used to just think most Americans) don’t understand the alternatives.

      Democracy has been proven not to work, and those involved in it will tell you that they agree, but there’s no better option. -

      Which if you think about it, isn’t really an answer.

      It’s like saying: Democracy doesn’t work, mathematically or otherwise. Try something that doesn’t breed corruption. They all do, democracy is just the best corruption.

      Which is bullshit. Mixing it up is the best way to stop the corruption.

      We need a lot of anarchy in the world right now, otherwise we’re just the fertilizer for power families. Our grandkids are fucked in general, except for the few that get a break.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        This comment is a great example of why electing a party that runs on deconstructing the public education system is an awful idea.

        We’re gonna start seeing ignorant comments like this way more often going forward.

        Buckle up.

        • Babalugats@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          When you say “ignorant comments like this” after you referring to yours?

          Genuine question.

          Democracy doesn’t work. The smaller countries notice it moreso. But the size of the US running a two part t system is insane, and not a true democracy. I wasn’t attacking anything but the platform that they use.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    While they won’t be able to reach Moscow with these, even from within Kursk, I am willing to bet the authorization was withheld on intelligence grounds. A lot of things in the war make sense if you look at it from the perspective that arms support can’t be guaranteed.

    Instead of letting Ukraine just burn through weapons, the US and allies have waited until they have the full operational capability to deploy the weapons with extreme effectiveness. They’ve had ATACMS for a while, so I suspect they held off deep strikes until the most effective targets had been identified and the likelihood of effective strike was near certain.

  • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    They only have 300 km range. They are very nice but still. Pretty sure Ukraine has struck further inland with drones.