• carl_marks_1312 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have only seen it used in reference to people who support dictatorial regimes with socialist aesthetics, mostly MLs.

    yet to see an anarchist be called a tankie

    https://hexbear.net/post/214901

    https://hexbear.net/post/374789

    https://hexbear.net/post/126901

    There’s more in the_dunk_tank if you’re willing to dig

    https://hexbear.net/c/the_dunk_tank

    Pro Tip: Sort by Top All. Anarchists getting called tankie tends to get a lot of upbears because we have anarchist comrades on our instance. We’re a left unity instance

    https://hexbear.net/search?q=tankie&type=All&listingType=All&communityId=31&page=1&sort=TopAll

    • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No idea what the first link is even about, seems incomprehensible. The second link seems true but I have no idea what was said prior. The third link is about programming. Seems there is one potential example of an anarchist being called a tankie. Seems like the vast majority of times it’s being used in reference to MLs still.

      In all seriousness there are plenty of people who misuse words but tankie seems to have a very clear and easily defined definition, it has even remained the same historically. Comparing it to the crazies using ‘woke’ is dishonest at best.

      • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        it has even remained the same historically

        lmao no it hasn’t. It originally referred specifically to people that supported the USSR putting down the Hungarian anti-communist protests. By the time “tankie” became a word (that only really ever had relevance in the UK) Stalin was long dead.

        • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea, people that supported a dictatorial regime with socialist aesthetics as in the USSR. What part of that has changed?

            • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It really depends on which bourgeois democracy. I may agree if compared to the US (I’m not too educated on the US so I could be wrong) but few others.

              Though I fail to understand how that has anything to do with the topic of tankie having a consistent definition.

              • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You claim that the USSR was a dictatorship with socialist aesthetics.

                Also, no, no bourgeois democracy is or was as democratic as the USSR. Look up dictatorship of the bourgeoisie vs dictatorship of the proletariat.

                • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Dictatorship of the proletariat as Marx wrote has never been achieved and arguably(Depending on how naive you believe Lenin was) has never even been worked towards. MLs bastardization of that in the form of a vanguard party is just a different dictatorship of the bourgeoisie as it creates a ruling class.

                  • MLs bastardization of that in the form of a vanguard party is just a different dictatorship of the bourgeoisie as it creates a ruling class.

                    Have you read marxist theory? What have you read? This comes off as grossly misinformed.