I don’t understand how Lemmy.world developers managed to surpass both Lemmy.ml and Beehaw.org instances in user activity.

  • Jeff@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Beehaw unlinked from Lemmy.world? Yeah will have to go smoke my beehaw account then if I can.

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      From what I recall (from all of 8 days ago) Beehaw said it was because lemmy.world allowed unrestricted signups and therefore was at risk from bots or (i guess) unsavory people, while Beehaw was trying to have a curated membership to be ‘safe’.

        • milo_bytes@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Their stated reason being that currently they don’t feel like they have the moderation tools to remove rule breaking content should a bunch of bots and spammers flood in

          I feel like that’s reasonable. Lemmy is still in very active development, and still building up a lot of features. Also, their defederation isn’t meant to be permanent either

          • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            People are switching now. If every instance took the beehaw approach, it would severely limit lemmy’s growth and it could miss its chance to become the next major link aggregator.

            From what I’ve seen, these sites are either it or they’re not it. The “network effect” of social media means content, users, and dev effort gravitates towards a single place.

        • sorenant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wouldn’t call them douchey. It’s not like they’re causing damage to anybody else and there’s nothing wrong with using their own lemmy instance as a local bbs.

          That said, I decided not to join them when I saw I would have to go through a sort of interview process explaining how I would contribute to them. They also have a long winded text to say the rules will be applied arbitrarily.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It seems somewhat lame or maybe insulting, but on the other hand not every site has to have the same philosophy. Lemmy is essentially forum software and instances don’t have to be federated with any others if they don’t want to be. If someone wanted they could start their own standalone site for Washington Park Roller Skating Club or whatever they want and that would be a fine use of the software.

        • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fully unrestricted Lemmy.world didn’t use captcha or require an email. Beehaw could ban someone and in seconds troll_2 would have a new account and pick back up.

    • 0xD@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s temporary until there are better mod tools - beehaw is supposed to be a safe space but they cannot keep their promise when federating with everyone else due to the amount of posts.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh don’t think it’s temporary they are going to be an island onto themselves.