• 16 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle













  • Hmm! That does sound good.

    Lets see.

    1/2 c. buckwheat
    1 c. unbleached flour
    6 Tbls. buttermilk powder (It’s what I happen to have, 🤷‍♂️ ).
    1/2 tsp. Salt
    1 Tbls. Sugar
    1/4 c. Ground pumpkin seeds.

    Soften 1 tsp. yeast in 3/4 cup warm water. Mix all ingredients with 1 Tbls. melted butter. Let sit covered for an hour, then place in the fridge over night. Can add more flour the next day if it’s too moist (Can’t remember the liquid to dry ratios, but unimportant for the first part. I can adjust for more/less when necessary).

    (update: Ok, that was the perfect amount of liquid. I’ll touch up some more flour when I place it in the fridge…On the other hand. Should have been more pumpkin seeds, or less flours. Meh! Will have to do…maybe I’ll find the will to grind more seeds up before I fry/bake it, heh).

    And I would mix it today for a deeper flavor.

    Slept pretty horribly last night which makes my pains worse, so I’ll push it back for tomorrow. Which will give me a chance to let it sit.




  • Woot! Two or three days later, and all the kinks worked themselves out. It’s good as is, but does need one slight modification. The squash around the slits needs to be covered up. That’s why some of them didn’t get the coloration.

    I think when I attempt this again, I’ll still up the flour, and to deal with the squash near the slits, I’ll pour over melted butter and sprinkle a little ginger over the top. I bet that will take care of any unwanted flavors.



  • Huh! I’ve found recipes for both types, but the precooked filling was all the ones using a pre-cooked crust, and all the others would be better described as a crustless quiche. However, the cooking timee for the latter were nermal cooking times for a pie. Still, though, diluting the zucchini with fruit flavor, is going to be the trick. I know it’s possible cooking and manually stirring it on the stove. Constrained within a pie shell?

    Again, I think I’m just going to have to try it.

    Alsn, I cut the outer skin off when turning zucchini into a fruit. Plus, I think a larger one might yield more flesh (as I cut out the seed and pulp from them). if I can remember it and am able to, I’ll document the process. (chronic pain sufferer, so I don’t exactly put a lot of effort into being presentable. Just existing is exhausting, Hah!).


  • > but my concern with cooking twice would be the moisture content more than the consistency.

    Ah! That’s something that escaped me. I’ll need to remember to add a little flour/cornstarch to the filling.

    > I’d peel them and then either dice them smallish or cut them into slices maybe a quarter inch thick. Whatever you did with the jam is probably going to work out in a pie shell, except you might consider how sweet it should be.

    That’s how I sliced them for the jam. As for sweetness, that won’t be a problem. I’m not a heavy sugar eater, so a small amount will go a long ways, and I have a good eye for the amount I like.

    Hmm! The part I’m mostly wondering about would be the convection currents (I think convection is the correct term, 🤔 . Currents caused by heat). Would the 45-55 minutes in the oven yield enough currents to mix the flavors so the squash gets infused with the other flavors? (Zucchini can lose almost all its flavor in place of the fruit). I know cooking the fruit within the shell works with rhubarb and apple (A small tart green apple, tree 15 feet in height, that can be found somewhat wild here in Western Kansas) , rhubarb and grape, and rhubarb and blueberries…

    I think I’m just going to have to try it. Nothing attempted, nothing tempting.




  • I did find that it can be done arbitrarily. Mind is definitely not into writing about it, though, but here’s the gp code I wrote to look it over.

    /*
        There may exist a 0<=t<s such that
        s divides both x and (x+(x%d)*(t*d-1))/d.
    
    
        To show this for solving for divisibility of 7 in 
        any natural number x.
    
        g(35,5,10) = 28
        g(28,5,10) = 42
        g(42,5,10) = 14
        g(14,5,10) = 21
        g(21,5,10) =  7
    */
    
    g(x,t,d)=(x+(x%d)*(t*d-1))/d;
    
    /* Find_t( x = Any natural number that is divisible by s,
               s = The divisor the search is being done for,
               d = The modulus restriction ).
    
        Returns all possible t values.
    */
    
    Find_t(x,s, d) = {
        V=List();
        
        for(t=2,d-1,
            C = factor(g(x,t,d));
            for(i=1,matsize(C)[1],if(C[i,1]==s, listput(V,t))));
            
        return(V);
    }   
    

    One thing that I noticed almost right away, regardless what d is, it seems to always work when s is prime, but not when s is composite.

    Too tired…Pains too much…Have to stop…But still…interesting.



  • Not sure, (“Older and a lot more decrepit” doesn’t mean “younger an a lot more mentally sound”, heh. Do wish I could change that, but meh, I can’t).

    Anyway, I did find a method similar to what you wrote, so I can redefine it in your terms.

    A base 20 number is divisible by 7 if the difference between 8 times the last digit and the remaining digits is divisible by 7.

    Ok, a little description on a base 20 number (Think Mayan and Nahuatl/Aztec numbers). 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19 should be considered single digits. So a base 10 number, 7*17 = 119 (1*10^2+1*10+9), would be 7*17 = 5:19 in a base 20 system (5*20+19).

    • is 1:8 divisible by 7? (28 in base 10). 8*8 = 3:4. 3:4-1 = 3:3
      • is 3:3 divisible by 7? 8 * 3 = 1:4. 1:4 - 3 = 1:1 (1*20+1 = 21).
    • is 9:2 divisible by 7? (182). 2*8 = 16. 16-9 = 7 Check.

    I’ll just leave that there. So a long weird way of saying, yes, that’s pretty much my reasoning, but not exactly at the same time. As the first message included the base 20 numbers divisible by the base 20 single digits 7, 13, and 17. (Hopefully that came off a little better).

    (Note: Saying “base 20 number[s]” is not important overall. Just being overly descriptive to differentiate between base 10 digits and base 20 digits).