Moved from @Crul@lemmy.world
Credit: A. Shipwright
Source: Under Pressure (by A. Shipwright - ArtStation)
Sometimes, you must not think too much.
------------------------------------------------------------
A.Shipwright
Deviantart https://www.deviantart.com/ashpwright
Twitter https://twitter.com/shipwrighta
Instagram www.instagram.com/a.shipwright
ArtStation profile: https://www.artstation.com/a_shipwright
RSS Feed: https://a_shipwright.artstation.com/rss
AFAIK, they are used as relays.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1-bit_computing#1-bit
Computers and microcomputers may also be used, but they tend to overcomplicate the task and often require highly trained personnel to develop and maintain the system. A simpler device, designed to operate on inputs and outputs one-at-a-time and configured to resemble a relay system, was introduced. These devices became known to the controls industry as programmable logic controllers (PLC).
See also the playlist linked in the other comment with more explanations:
1-Bit Breadboard Computer - Usagi Electric (YouTube)
For those curious about 1-bit computers, see Usagi Electric’s playlist:
My 2 cents: I have a similar relation with smartphones as yours.
In my case, what I fear the most is some app getting my contact list and using it to send some kind of “XXX has joined YYY service” notification to all of them. Also, I didn’t like that Google had all the data they wanted, so I ended with 2 smartphones:
AFAIK I’ve only had one incident because I trusted Telegram too much. There is always non-zero risk, but this works for me.
Fixed, thanks!
I dind’t saw them, thanks!
I edited the post with the english versions.
Source: Help – The Jenkins
Not the first time someone says it fails.
But I cannot get it to fail, it works for me.
You can try the RSS button on their Tapas profile: https://tapas.io/series/Doodle-Time/info
Yep, that’s why I added the twitter source too.
Source: https://www.commitstrip.com/2015/04/27/the-eye-opener-commit/
Also on twitter:
I’ve only used on the desktop, but there is Proxigram, an alternative frontend for IG.
I think you’re confusing “arbitrarily large” with “infinitely large”. See Wikipedia Arbitrarily large vs. (…) infinitely large
Furthermore, “arbitrarily large” also does not mean “infinitely large”. For example, although prime numbers can be arbitrarily large, an infinitely large prime number does not exist—since all prime numbers (as well as all other integers) are finite.
For integers I disagree (but I’m not a mathematician). The set of integers with infinite digits is the empty set, so AFAIK, it has probability 0.
Doesn’t it depends on whether we are talking about real or integer numbers?
EDIT: I think it also works with p-adic numbers.
Thanks for the info!
I crossposted this to (what I considered) the relevant communities, where I added that as an edit.