Okay, now do a coherent book with themes and plot that carry through out the whole book.
Okay, now do a coherent book with themes and plot that carry through out the whole book.
Not at the moment at least, if ever.
Microsoft is a good underdog because they have infinite money. And a really bad market leader, I bet worse than Sony. It would’ve been way better for the industry to not let them acquire the big boys they have.
Fuck off. The tech got popular and public got educated on what makes it work.
It definitely is a different story when your (presumably) really good friend with industry connections is a piece of shit compared to just doing the right thing without risking anything, even getting praise for it. He’s just a human with maybe less than average integrity who did good when it suited him. Who can really say why they wrote the letter.
I’ve been wondering about this too.
My guess is that women don’t prefer to pay a higher price to get home safely but that’s just reality they live in. Also it’s an inconvenience to wait longer for a ride so why would they choose that just to spite men?
Also they (women) can probably decide from experience if they usually get harassed by men or someone else and choose to opt in to this program based on that. If it’s nonsense then they won’t do it because why would they.
Also only 23% of Lyft’s driver are women (based on a super fast search) so this actually happens to also help that issue as well indirectly as their demand grows.
Well getting harassed is also not fair.
Also this probably will have an unintended consequence of letting the popular gender choice(s) earn more, as there is less supply and more demand than if the whole driver pool was available.
While I don’t think it’s as straight forward calculation as Norgur thinks, you’re forgetting that star power has marketing reach beyond just name recognition on a poster. People want to hear from them. They give interviews, promote at events and give status to the movie: It will be featured more in media which in itself means that more people will hear about it (even if they don’t choose the movie based on that name) which means they’re more likely to consider seeing it at a later date as they recognize it.
It’s also worth giving them the benefit of a doubt. It might be just a bug or an oversight.
I don’t see how player data even would be worth risking GDPR fines. But at least you don’t have to worry about it.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) gives individuals the right to ask for their data to be deleted and organisations do have an obligation to do so, except in the following cases:
- the personal data your company/organisation holds is needed to exercise the right of freedom of expression;
You can’t delete your account if you’re banned? Seems a bit iffy.
Mint flavored all the way through, baybeh!
Yeah. I looove the diarrhea I get from eating tubes of mint toothpaste.
So that’s why Elon Musk made those scientists invent a flamethrower.
Is it even widely used anymore?
Heh, I can appreciate that. Just commented so nobody will use that as a justification why fines shouldn’t be based on revenue.
For real, it’s ugly and way too bright and fucking stupid but whoever had a week to create x-shaped disturbingly blinking sun did an okay job imo.
I thought you were saying ai was able to create that final book with an ending? I guess not.