The anti cheat in league is literally a rootkit.
When it came out there was an outcry and their statement was basically “okay okay, so its a rootkit. But guys, you can trust us! We’re totally not going to do anything nefarious with it!”
I can’t believe people still play that shit.
Low level accountants in the early 20th century.
No binary monstrosity could ever replace just doing it in your head.
The person who chained him to the wall asks “And how do you interpret this situation?” He replies “it sucks.”
Follow the money. It goes from the wealthy to the government (taxes), to us to the wealthy through our purchases.
And right now it goes from the poor to the government (taxes) to the wealthy, and we don’t get fuck all.
You’re saying you’d rather have nothing than have something.
Is “ethical” even a protected word with a legal definition?
Or is their defense just going to be “we really believe this is ethical, and we are allowed to say what we believe”?
I can’t find it now, but there is an Existential Comic that addresses this attitude perfectly. The philosopher is talking about how he always has some form of freedom, so he gets chained to a wall in a dungeon, and then he says “at least I still have the freedom to interpret my situation!”
That costs a ton of money
As if they don’t have it?
Fuckin please. I’m so sick of hearing that something to “too expensive” for a multi billion dollar, multinational corporation.
Most commercials I’d see would be billboards EVERYWHERE in the real world when I lived in Mexico (seriously, Mexican government, please do something about this, it’s beyond bad there) but now here in Canada, it’s mostly pretty quiet and nice.
Unless you’re going through a native rez, then there’s billboards EVERYWHERE because allowing them to put up ads that are illegal for everyone else counts as reconciliation, I guess.
No, that’s just being stoned.
It will be stronger than a normal coffee, but it still won’t have any caffeine.
There is a distinction between flavor and caffeine content. Decaffeinating does change the flavor but that doesn’t mean you can’t make it strong.
Meat is only ruined if the animal is stressed during slaughter.
Prior to that, for large animals like cows, only the last three months of feeding matters for the quality of the meat. Far less time for smaller animals.
Treating animals well has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of the meat, except in the few moments immediately before slaughter. We should treat animals well on a matter of principle, and that’s basically the only argument there is to it.
To be clear, I agree with that principle.
That’s funny because the grocery I work for is pushing hard on online orders. They love it. The only logic I’ve heard so far is that online orders are a “guaranteed sale”, whatever that’s supposed to mean.
They literally tell us to set product aside and not put it on the shelf so we can sell it online instead. They are valuing online shoppers way over in store shoppers.
I’ll be satisfied when the quality of life for average citizens starts going up again.
How much is that expressed as percentage of his total wealth?
A quick search revealed $185b, which is probably his net worth and not his total wealth, but we’ll go with it:
8.3 / 185 * 100 = ~4.49%
For reference, I paid over 20% of my total wealth last year.
So I actually paid more than 4x as much tax as Musk did, relative to the amount of wealth we have.
We should start a brigade to issue DMCA takedowns for every Disney video on YouTube.
They’ll just make certification so expensive only the wealthy will qualify.
You’ll never hear another perspective again.
It’s interesting, because the idea is basically that knowledge and ideas should be constructive, so as not to pollute the sum of human knowledge.
So that raises the question, what is the constructive conclusion to “memetic effluent”? Without one, is the concept itself an example of such effluent?
I’m on your side. Your rule makes sense, and what other people are doing doesn’t make sense.
Stick to your rule and tell everyone else they’re wrong.
So the exact same reaction that men the world over have when women start demanding equal rights.
Because Korea in general has been historically misogynistic
There’s nothing particularly Korean about this. Basically every culture is historically misogynistic, the exceptions are few and far between and are generally romanticized based on limited information.
The exact same reactions took place in America 100 years ago during women’s suffrage, and are taking place again now with the abortion debacle.
That’s some solid reframing, bro 👍