HR. Have never met anyone in HR who contributed to the good.
HR. Have never met anyone in HR who contributed to the good.
Is that… a napkin dispenser built into the stair wall?
AI, particularly in how the likes of microsoft are marketing it to businesses.
Can’t believe I’ve never heard of this one. Thank you for the recommendation
Looks like I’ll be rewatching Heat tonight
Can’t imagine they have too many spare units to locate there…
Microprose. Silent Service II and Special Forces were so good
Punching nazis. Always acceptable, even encouraged.
Is this a trick question? The item on the left is clearly a rolled up facecloth.
Nothing gets stuck in my teeth man.
Or, doesn’t get acid reflux man.
Guessing football and wrestling in high school, growth hormones in their meat, and an element of obesity. These are all guesses though, not shitting on the yanks.
The ultimate goal is equality, but it takes targeted support of women to attain that.
I’m not saying that men’s issues should remain unresolved, but the intent of the Tory MP is not to support men. It is to divide and conquer.
Who’s responsibility includes reducing the disparity between men and women. Having a minister for men introduces parity in this regard, which therefore does nothing to advance the interest of women in a male dominated system
This is the same difference between Black Lives Matter and All Lives Matter. Nobody is saying that men should not be advocated for, but elevating the issue of men’s rights to ministerial level does not help resolve the larger issue of the systemic disadvantage of women in society.
It’s a disingenuous argument. The MP is from the Conservative Party, i.e., the right wing arsehole party.
You may have noticed how the Right Wing Playbook has been imported from America. Increasingly, when things aren’t going politically well, they’ll have a look at the Playbook and pick a Culture Wars trope. This is one such instance, intended only to divide.
The r/dontputyourdickinthat was seemingly unending
Panhandle behaviour.
I think it’s because they use their position to professionalise a bullshit job, presenting it as a field (HR Management), when their skills are rather ordinary. Really, they should be doing payroll and employment admin, not setting the tone for the organisation or being seen as specialists in any meaningful way. Also, job competencies and profiles disproportionality reward the “skills” found in HR, which i think reflects their input in designing these tools and templates.
Further, i find people who work in this field to have quite a high opinion of themselves and their usefulness.