Hydrogen and oxygen burn explosively. It wouldn’t last long

Why are you so aggressive? Lack of sleep? I was just asking

Are you something else? What’s your work schedule?

I read it, and I read the messages from the devs. The communication issue I am trying to point is also highlighted in the comments: if the decision on merging a PR is uniquely dictated by financial benefits of IBM, ignoring the broader benefits of the community, the message is that red hat is looking for free labor and it is not really interested in anything else. Which is absolutely the case, as we all know, but writing it down after the recent events is another PR issue, as red hat justified controversial decisions on the lack of contributions from downstream.

The Italian dev tried to put it down as “we have to follow our service management processes that are messy, tedious and expensive” but he didn’t address the problems in the original message. The contributor himself felt like they asked his contribution just to reject it because of purely financial reasons without any additional details. It is a new PR incident

The Apparently is already patch on fedora… Just reporting other comments in this thread. But why do they accept contribution to centos of they don’t want patches that are not economically beneficial to the company? It is a pretty bad message written as this

I stopped recommending it. It is a pity, but there are alternatives

Why would they accept PR at all if they don’t have a robust testing process and approvals are dictated by customers needs?

The message as it is now to potential contributors is that their contribution in not welcome, unless its free labor to financially benefit only ibm.

Which is fair, but the message itself is a new PR issue for red hat

Catholic Church nowadays is actually already ready to incorporate extraterrestrial life in their preaching. There is a whole astronomical “research” center in Vatican dedicated to align scientific theories such as big bang within catholic preaching.

This is part of it https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican_Observatory

Unfortunately that is not the case. Closed sourced software for small communities are not safer. My company had an incredibly embarrassing data leak because they outsourced some work and trusted a software used also by the competitors. Unfortunately the issue was found by one of our customers and ended up on the newspapers.

Absolutely deserved, but still, closed sourced stuff is not more secure

Buy better pasta! I’d suggest rummo or de Cecco, they are good and easy to find outside Italy

Here it is, all for you https://open-assistant.io/

You also get a useless leader board to replace reddit karma!

It is anyway a legit initiative to help for open source LLMs

You are joking, but this is exactly what happens if you optimize accuracy of an algorithm to classify something when positive cases are very few. The algorithm will simply label everything as negative, and accuracy will be anyway extremely high!

What site are you talking about exactly?

It can be done still keeping independent instances, by just distributing data and load across instances connected to the network, depending on their available resources, instead of explicitly creating new duplicated users on each instance.

It however require a lot of work and effort. I don’t know if anyone will ever manage to implement it.

Lemmy currently misses a sync feature across servers. Meaning that moving one lose all subscription and messages.

The real solutions should be a distributed network to support federation, instead than a plain federated one, i.e. an automated redistribution of users and loads across servers (lemmy instances).

I don’t know how they are planning to manage it on the long run