![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
You can have very high income and still live paycheck to paycheck if you spend every paycheck
You can have very high income and still live paycheck to paycheck if you spend every paycheck
Most areas don’t need $100,000 a year to afford a “very modest house”, you could get a nice mobile home and afford to pay off the loan in just a couple years.
Speaking to something doesn’t mean it understands and reacts to it.
How do you get headphones to last 10 years? I usually have to replace mine every year or so, because of the padding wilting, or normal wears, or just something happening.
I admit I didn’t read that, but I also think it’s ridiculous that just because they at some point texted that, that it somehow makes it an accurate description.
What do the filthy rich have to do with this?
Federal prosecutors said they have messages from Branson stating that he was “committing felonies” and “telling buyers he was ‘on a killing spree’ to obtain eagle tail feathers for future sales.”
It doesn’t really say the context though. And, again, it doesn’t matter if they believe it themselves. I’m not defending them. I’m saying this is no different from other poachers, and describing it as a killing spree when it went on over years is clickbait. Regardless of if they said it or not.
I’m confused why you’re responding that to me
The ruling class needs hunting trophies of the species they’re driving extinct.
Bald Eagles are not endangered.
Bald Eagles are pests in some of Alaska. They violated the law and so are poachers, but how is this ethically different from working at a slaughterhouse?
Another day of “prosecutor uses inflammatory words to help newspapers write headlines”. It’s not a “killing spree”, it’s just poaching. They are normal poachers, not serial killers.
I don’t like the notion that something having majority market share makes it a monopoly. The definition of monopoly, at least, as understood by me implies control of supply, not just having a higher demand.
No, of course not. There is just a very poor reputation for UN Peace keeping forces, so giving them martial law in one of the most contested places in the world might not end any better.
What do you mean? The internet on average in general tends to me more left leaning, and that usually increases the younger the average user.
Yeah? I mean, I don’t agree with him on most things, but for all you can criticize him for, why that?
Drug dependence doesn’t make someone inherently a bad person, nor does being Russian.
Well yeah and I imagine the data coming from Twitter would have a left bias.
Argumentative accounts that personally attack and downvote, even though there is absolutely zero reason - there wasn’t even any disagreement on the main points, just anger on minor details.
That’s been here for a while. When I became a mod of c/politics some users stalked my profile to use it as proof my me being a terrible choice. They’re evidence was me not having a degree in political science, disagreeing with them on some issues, and having a complicated relationship with my mom. I said simply check the modlogs, and there haven’t been any complaints since.
Or “smart” person. There are almost certainly bots who espouse beliefs that align with yours too.
Found a reddit mod with a dozen plus accounts. Made a new account to disagree with me, I pointed it out, and he denied it, but never used that account again.
It was probably just someone with no life, but I’d feel better about the world if he were being paid for it.
It can, it also sometimes can’t unless you ask it “could it be x answer”