You didn’t get the joke.
You are complaining that meta refuses to ban bigots, but aknowledge you arent allowed on the site for calling people cocksuckers.
You didn’t get the joke.
You are complaining that meta refuses to ban bigots, but aknowledge you arent allowed on the site for calling people cocksuckers.
I don’t know, man, if you got banned from Facebook for calling somebody a cocksucker, it sounds like they are trying to hold right wingers accountable.
More big women for me then.
Your argument seems to be that we should consider the AI to itself be an artist and to grant it the rights of other artists.
That’s fair.
But other artists aren’t allowed to profit off reproducing other’s works.
They also are compensated for their work.
Is OpenAI putting money in a trust for when their product gains sentience?
Legitimate uses of brains often aren’t relying on the black market though.
I suspect that somebody sold it to an obscura collector, film production, or pervert.
If artists aren’t producing work and just complaining about AI art, who is AI stealing the work of?
Your argument literally defeats itself.
Indian take out for my wife costs about $44.
The same items ordered on the delivery apps comes out to about $56 and then after fees and tips is roughly $80.
I wish these companies were only $2 more expensive than just going to the restaurant.
The biggest issue is that true information is behind paywalls while the lies are handed out for free.
Americans have an almost Pavlovian response to news at this point, where they fundamentally can not trust a source of information until that source suggests the reader begin taking erection medication.
They haven’t banned her as a future recipient of health services. They just effectively banned her from ever making a dime in the entire health services industry.