![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/375119b1-092e-4933-bc27-14fea018c258.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
I thought it was a really good representation of the OpenAI search engine.
I thought it was a really good representation of the OpenAI search engine.
Just imagine a word where all the people talk like LLMs
Have you talked to real people lately? I thinking I’m leaning towards the dystopian version of humanity.
Well…Trump didn’t sign it…It must be good right?
I didn’t make any assumptions. By default, the statement made in the paper is not sexist.
By making assumptions, you bring in your bias and sexism. You just made 3 or 4 to justify your position
Which proves my point. I question the data, I’m a sexist pig. It’s a hard field when your data is shaky.
default kneejerk reaction to not take a woman’s observations or experiments as seriously as a man’s
The default kneejerk reaction in acidemia and high level engineering in general is to do just that. For example: “The fuq, you did not get superconductivity at room temperature.”
That’s not sexism…it’s healthy skepticism, and I think the root of all this. People get questioned in the field, hard…The good scientists and engineers put up with it, because it’s appropriate, and they can defend their data.
I get the point you’re trying to make, but I’ve seen enough healthy skepticism be misconstrued as sexism to be really skeptical of these results.
Such experiences included sexist microaggressions and stereotyping; such as questioning women’s academic legitimacy,
That’s the core of a STEM degree. You are constantly challenged about your conclusions. That’s not sexism, that’s how science works.
They don’t like Ukranians because Russia doesn’t like Ukraine. It’s not a racial thing.
They’re waiting to see if Trump is in office. He can be bought for fairly cheap.
Are these even street legal in the US? Our safety standards are obscene. Air bags alone cost 5k.
It’s why Tata never released a vehicle here.
This seems like it was written by a very bitter and jealous ex-google employee.
It’s all true, but the experimental and failure cycle isn’t a bad thing. It’s just how you innovate.
Even a secular single state won’t fix the outright hatred between Islam and Judaism. It’d just be two tribes killing each other under the same flag.
You have to fix that root hatred, and I don’t think you can without some sort of religious persecution.
I stand by my statement. It’s a childish conflict that will never end.
Exactly. I stand by my original comment.
So what exactly is your proposed solution? Do we create a terrorist state (look up hamas approval rates before you dismiss that statement) or let Israel complete it’s genocide?
There’s not a solution to this problem and there never will be.
But how should we solve it…humor me.
I think this is likely. After dealing with how bad W11 is, MS realized they don’t need working software or backwards compatibility to sell units.
Meh…two children fighting over a special place in the sandbox.
I’m racist is all you’ve got for that? Really? Brilliant rebuttle.
That’s correct…I think they should both rot in prison…but only one was let go. Why is that?
She also disregarded a state department directive that Russia is a dangerous country to go to for Americans.
So, not only was she above the law, she felt she was above the US government’s intelligence department as well.
She’s put national security at risk and we all fucking paid for Biden making an appeal to black voters.
Then Bing it is. I switched on my daily machine and DDG has been ok. Still a lot of sponsored shit I don’t need, but better than getting a solid lie from Google