Are they just hiring Cuban physicians for pennies?
Communism is incredibly helpful if you are a capitalist and want to pay slave wages to its refugees.
Are they just hiring Cuban physicians for pennies?
Communism is incredibly helpful if you are a capitalist and want to pay slave wages to its refugees.
Individuals that sell billion dollar paintings to the Pentagon.
And they all compete vigorously against one another, behind the scenes!
How awesome would it be to have testimony to this effect
I don’t care about trans people though.
As humans, yes, sure. But their group identity carries no special valence for me.
So I think you raise a reasonable point, but I don’t think it’s an influence here.
I disagree. His old material was hilarious. And still is, IMO.
I don’t want to have to opt out
If the value proposition for users is so great, then make it opt-in!
The fact that they’re not willing to go this far tells you everything you need to know: that it’s user hostile.
I find the experience to be superior to Windows in every way, including driver support. And it gets more and more stark with every version of Windows.
Ten, you say? Is that still supported?.
I used to love Dave Chappelle. He gave a huge fuck you to the establishment back in the day, and deserved credit for that. He was punching up.
But he decided it bothered him that trans issues got the spotlight, and that he wanted to punch down. Ok: fair play. Yell some jokes.
But then the jokes suck. They’re not insightful. They’re not full of commentary. They don’t highlight dissonance on people’s words or actions.
And if you’re punching down and aren’t funny, you’re not a comedian… you’re just an asshole
This is too good: I couldn’t tell if it was satire until I looked at the comments.
Dave Chappelle isn’t funny anymore
Totally agree
Your contributors must attribute copyright or agree to any reason license if you choose this. (This seems so obvious to me that I didn’t mention it)
But it’s still strictly superior to MIT licensing, which has the same requirement (since that’s part of copyright law, not party is the license itself), while still preventing commercial adoption under a different license.
That is incredible
A lot of posts are from bots. It would be cool if the bots could make a whole new submission and not link back, but all things considered I’m just happy there is interesting content.
This is simply wrong.
Is you release software that YOU OWN as AGPL, there is nothing stopping you from also licensing it as non AGPL, for a fee, in the future. I’m fact this is more possible with AGPL, since it disallows Tivoization.
If there’s a chance you want to make money off of it, AGPL is 1000x better than MIT. Once you release under MIT, a corporation can take it and do anything. If it’s AGPL a company can take it and do anything once they negotiate a license for it, and pay you for the privilege.
Ninite may fit here, to
Because they are empty or because they are full of contaminants?
A divine warrant for action.
Everything else follows.
Donkeys and det cord; the classic RPG