The same DNC that blamed the left for Hillary losing and then credited centrism with Biden winning?

Those are fine goals, but pragmatism involves addressing reality as it is, not how you would like it to be. I doubt you can achieve both removing legitimacy from the system as you see it and forcing the DNC to speak to the left simultaneously since the DNC is a part of the system that’s in place. Unfortunately the DNC appealing to the left needs to be a two way street, make the left more appealing to the DNC than the right. All those Republicans endorsing Harris is the right appealing to the DNC, the left needs to out do that effort to pull the DNC to the left. Rejecting them won’t do that, only the opposite.

What’s pragmatic about voting for a long shot candidate in a system that so heavily favors the two major parties?

Right, but keep in mind how low the bar is for politicians. They have people for this.

Are we sure this isn’t the first presidential election where a candidate even knows what a pdf is?

I’ve seen people staple their arms because they couldn’t think of anything better to do. You can have an impulse that you don’t actually want to do but which you follow through on

Waluigi and Wario. I like to eat motorcycles in bed I guess

“Flops” means “inspired threats of violence” now?

Give her the time to campaign and not deal with any presidential duties

I share these with friends who might not get it. It’s like a UDP joke

Although you may be right, this is not actually The Onion

Or Earl

I’ll check it out, thanks!

Are you sure that’s not the lemon you gave life?

Dungeondraft, Wonderdraft, FoundryVTT. Battle map making, world map making, and virtual table top respectively

It’s very good. Wario land is my personal favorite

My critique is he makes one assertion and backs it up with style instead of actually developing or analyzing it. He takes a single basic observation and uses it an a blunt instrument. Sellers set prices. Brilliant observation. Don’t bother looking into why, just feel upset about it.
It’s like he sees an apple fall from a tree to the ground and declares “That tree threw an apple at the ground, trees hate the ground!” Ignoring outside forces completely.
He’s not wrong on individual points, but the whole thing is incredibly myopic.

He starts by saying that’s the first thing to consider and then instead of going on to other points just starts using his spooky scary voice to say it over again. I find that presentation style hard to trust

Kind of disappointed it’s a bunch of sequels.