the one used by bootlickers to defend every bad thing the company does

  • BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like a good reason radically restructure (if not entirely dismantle) those companies.

    We should make medicine to treat sick people. We should build houses to shelter the unhoused. We should grow food to feed the hungry.

    The fact that most companies currently responsible for food and housing and medicine are primarily motivated by shareholder value instead of effective community service represents a structural conflict of interest.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. Isn’t that neoliberalism? We outsource everything to companies in the name of efficiency?

      • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep and many times it does NOT work. In the UK Margaret Thatcher pushed heavily into neoliberalism and the current gov is still pushing it and it’s led to public transport not being reliable (not punctual and expensive) rivers being filled with shit because the water companies are not keeping rivers clean, people being denied welfare support because the task of assessing it has been moved to private firms who give bonuses for failing people.