Hundreds of unsheltered people living in tent encampments in the blocks surrounding the Moscone Convention Center in San Francisco have been forced to leave by city outreach workers and police as part of an attempted “clean up the house” ahead of this week’s Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation’s annual free trade conference.

The action, which housing advocates allege violated a court injunction, was celebrated by right-wing figures and the tech crowd, who have long been convinced that the city is in terminal decline because of an increase in encampments in the downtown area.

The X account End Wokness wrote that the displacement was proof the “government can easily fix our cities overnight. It just doesn’t want to” (the post received 77,000 likes). “Queer Eye but it’s just Xi visiting troubled US cities then they get a makeover,” joked Packy McCormick, the founder of Not Boring Capital and advisor to Andreessen Horowitz’s crypto VC team. The New York Post celebrated the action, saying that residents had “miraculously disappeared.”

  • interceder270@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I never said it was easy, but it is doable.

    If you can’t afford to live there, why should someone else foot the bill? Because you’re entitled? You think supply and demand doesn’t apply to you? You think you’re “too good” to live outside of a major city, even though many others do?

    Yeah. Thanks for proving my point.

    • braxy29@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      nobody is paying my bills but me. i’m just getting tired of the argument i have been seeing around lemmy lately that wanting to stay in the city (where many of us have JOBS) is “entitled.” i think real estate and rental markets are fucking bonkers when they are pricing out most americans. i have a middle class professional job and i can barely afford it - what about those who work in the service industry who make even less? rent is even harder to cover, and small towns don’t have job markets that can accommodate many.

      guess what? people go where the jobs are. this isn’t about being “too good” to live somewhere, it’s about being in a catch-22 of choosing between employment/healthcare/family and rent.

      quit putting your words in my mouth (“too good,” where the fuck did i say that?) and try talking to actual people.

        • braxy29@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          yes, i noticed. bleh, i probably shouldn’t even bother, but i find the idiocy of this argument absolutely infuriating.

          • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Wait, you don’t think people opt into homelessness because they just really want to live in the big city? LOL

            I volunteer with a local shelter so I’m pretty up to date on the latest research. I can say from a position of minor authority that this dude is nuts. It’s particularly funny for me because I was homeless for a few years in my twenties, there’s no way I’d do it again voluntarily.

            Regardless, if they’re so desperate to be “right” that they game completely pointless numbers, I suspect they’re not going to engage in any sort of reasoned discussion.

            • braxy29@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              many of the folks i work with are functionally homeless and i wish i could do more. i’m glad you made it out alright!