This isn’t my phrase, but I quite like it: “People are way too used to everything on the internet being free.” (It’s in one of Mental Outlaw’s videos.)Some say this is especially true for software/products/websites that are run by just one person or a very small team. They just have to make money in some way, or they are not able to pay their bills at the end of the month. So, if they ask for €2 a month to support the product, I can totally agree with it. For those who use the product for free and have the money to support it, then they should do it.For big companies, it’s a totally different conversation. For example, Google offers every Google service for free (to my knowledge) and if you need more, then you can buy it (Google One). They can easily handle the cost, but I think in the YouTube part, it’s a bit critical. I don’t have any information about the cost that Google has to pay for YouTube, but I think it’s a LOT. Many can’t imagine how much storage they have to pay for. They probably have to buy PB (1000xTB) or even PB of storage just to save the videos, and 4k videos can take up a lot of space. Therefore, they are asking for a fee to let people watch 4k because it is so expensive. But they don’t just have to save the videos; they also have to back up the videos, and that’s the part that needs the most storage. I don’t know which RAID level they are using, but I would say 5 or 6 (maybe?). That means that videos are stored on several HDDs, so if one breaks, the video isn’t lost, and the higher level of RAID can lose several disks before losing the actual video. So, to come back to the point, I can understand why they are charging for YouTube and some features.
This isn’t my phrase, but I quite like it: “People are way too used to everything on the internet being free.” (It’s in one of Mental Outlaw’s videos.)Some say this is especially true for software/products/websites that are run by just one person or a very small team. They just have to make money in some way, or they are not able to pay their bills at the end of the month. So, if they ask for €2 a month to support the product, I can totally agree with it. For those who use the product for free and have the money to support it, then they should do it.For big companies, it’s a totally different conversation. For example, Google offers every Google service for free (to my knowledge) and if you need more, then you can buy it (Google One). They can easily handle the cost, but I think in the YouTube part, it’s a bit critical. I don’t have any information about the cost that Google has to pay for YouTube, but I think it’s a LOT. Many can’t imagine how much storage they have to pay for. They probably have to buy PB (1000xTB) or even PB of storage just to save the videos, and 4k videos can take up a lot of space. Therefore, they are asking for a fee to let people watch 4k because it is so expensive. But they don’t just have to save the videos; they also have to back up the videos, and that’s the part that needs the most storage. I don’t know which RAID level they are using, but I would say 5 or 6 (maybe?). That means that videos are stored on several HDDs, so if one breaks, the video isn’t lost, and the higher level of RAID can lose several disks before losing the actual video. So, to come back to the point, I can understand why they are charging for YouTube and some features.
Are you… Disagreeing with every autocorrect your phone is giving you?
Holy shit! That was the most excruciating comment I’ve ever read. Like seriously, he literally dismissed everything his autocorrect tried to fix.
It almost feels deliberate but that seems like effort
I have a coworker who types like this, they might have turned it off altogether
I haven’t used autocorrect since I turned it off on my iPhone 3GS. It’s not that hard to not type like a lunatic.
They might be using a FOSS keyboard. I’m on Floris Board and there is currently no auto-correct.
Holy shit, it’s typo man! He does exist…