• LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    102
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Yes. You people just cost money. Pay, or find a new service. I’m not so sure what’s confusing about this.

    Google isn’t going to let you use the service for free anymore.

    Edit: Reading comprehension seems to be at an all time low. None of this has to do with you liking YouTube or not. Nobody cares if you don’t like Google’s data farming. It’s 100% irrelevant.

    • eltrain123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      6 months ago

      If google stops strip mining my data when I pay for their service, I’d do it in a heartbeat. I’m not going to pay to be someone’s product.

    • TheEntity@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      And yet they were perfectly okay with providing the service for free while they were still busy starving off the competition. No tears for Google shall be shed here.

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        47
        ·
        6 months ago

        What? They are exactly a billion video and comment streaming platforms.

        And I’m not telling you to have years for Google. I’m highlighting that the free ride is over. Pay or use a different service.

    • Rooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Please tell google then, if we allow ads, then dont shoot at us 10 unskippable ads.

      1 ad per video < 10 minutes. 2 ads per video > 10 < 20. 4 ads per video > 20 +2 ads per extra 10 minutes

      Ads maximum length of 30 seconds. Ads should be monitored for anything illegal or harmfull for the viewer ( Scams, Malicious websites … )

      If google chose to do this instead of every minutes 2 unskippable ads ( or soon 5 ) i would think, there would be less adblock users on youtube. And with that you support more your favorite creator ( if you want to really support him, just give him some bucks on patreon or so ). Or just suggest him to go to any other video hosting website ( like peertube ) then users will have 0 ads and you can get support over donations.

        • TheEntity@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          6 months ago

          We can simultaneously move along and criticize their decisions as exploitative double-dipping on their users. Criticizing them thankfully doesn’t require a subscription, or even an account.

    • Aielman15@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Google is already making millions by profiling its users and stealing their data. All these YT changes are not caused by them losing money, but by them not growing enough to please their (multi-millionaires) investors.

      (1) I’m not shedding any tears for a corporation that’s big enough to have more money that I’ll ever see in ten lifetimes.

      (2) I’m not paying for a “Premium” experience to allow them to keep profiling me (and thus gain more money). They are already gaining money off me, they don’t need my premium subscription.

      (3) You should stop arguing in favour of exploitative big corporations that don’t even know you and are probably actively exploiting you in this very moment.

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        6 months ago

        What does any of that have to with what I said? Great, you don’t like yt, good for you. Who is asking you to shed a tear?

        YT doesn’t want freeloaders. Pay up, see ads, or play cat and mouse avoiding them.

        • Aielman15@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m not a freeloader because Google is already making a profit off me by profiling me. They are just being greedy and asking for more. If you are happy donating your hard-earned money to the trillion-dollars corporation that’s exploiting you, good for you. I am a sane individual and I’d rather put that money to good use. In fact, by donating to the WWF, I’m spending less money yearly than a YT premium subscriber, and I’m making someone happy that deserves it more than Google’s sleazy investors.

          • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            6 months ago

            So you go into restaurants and demand half priced food? The price is the price. Pay it out deal with Google making your videos slow. I’m really not sure how all of you are turning this a value thing. It’s utterly irrelevant.

            • Aielman15@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Your argument falls flat the moment you realize an alternative to YT doesn’t exist because all these bit corporations have spent years either starving off or buying the competition, and they are now happily enjoying the monopoly they have created.

              I don’t expect Google to ever cater to me, and I fully expect them to keep their war going against AdBlock. It’s their job to make more money, after all. But the point is, it’s their job, not mine. I’ll keep doing what I think I rightfully deserve, which is, watch a few videos without the hassle of ads provided by the big corporation that has taken my data without my consent, sold it to the highest bidder, and made a fuckload of money off it.

              • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                6 months ago

                Oh so tiktok isn’t real and competing with YT? And twitch is just in my imagination? And I guess the curiosity stream is fake too!

                • Aielman15@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  I’m confused about what you’re trying to say, because none of those are YT alternatives.

                  TikTok is centered on short videos. Twitch is a platform for streamers, mainly for video game content creators. Curiosity Stream is a platform hosting professional documentaries and science shows, it’s great but it has nothing to do with the amateurish nature of YT content.

                  All of those cater to a specific niche of YT (YT shorts, video game let’s play, and science channels, respectively), but there’s a huge chunk of content that doesn’t appear on any of those services, but is present and thriving on YT.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          YT doesn’t want freeloaders

          Nobody is a freeloader on Youtube (or any other Google app)

    • nicetriangle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They had premium light which gave you just a no ad experience and nothing else for about $7/mo. Totally reasonable, I was happy to pay it. Then right at the same time they started going nuclear on ad blocking, they killed that plan and forced everyone to move to a plan that costs about 70% more and added a bunch of stuff I didn’t ask for and will never use. They had those added services available already prior to that change. If I had wanted them I’d already be subscribing. This was just a greedy cash grab.

      They’ll just keep jacking the price up and decreasing the quality of service and mining your data and annoying you with ads and algorithmic bullshit just up until they can’t anymore and it stops being optimally profitable. A lot of people will just put up with it, but they lost me as a customer.

        • nicetriangle@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          It is honestly embarrassing as shit spending 3 hours of your time on a weekend arguing with like a dozen people in defense of one of the highest market cap megacorps in the world. Get a hobby dude.

          • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            6 months ago

            I assure you it’s been like 30m of time between shits. If you are angry enough to be checking the history at least get it right.

    • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      Is your “you people” targeted at the ones using Adblock?

      If so, here’s another approach; If YouTube actually had a decent ‘premium’ without all the unnecessary “features” in it and the price wasn’t so unreasonable high. People might have paid for it.

      In my country YouTube Premium costs €12/monthly which is €144/yearly and for what? Unnecessary features and to block advertisements while still having in-video advertisements (sponsors). No thank you.

      I will go with uBlock Origin and Sponsorblock.

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        40
        ·
        6 months ago

        People love premium. Let’s not confuse you and lemmys average user with the general public.

        $18 a month for family streaming + music is a bargain.

        Also, that’s all great that you use tools to get around it. My point is stop bitching about it or acting like Google is evil for blocking people who refuse to pay 🤷‍♂️

        • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          $18 a month for family streaming + music is a bargain.

          Wow your brain really has been taken hostage hasn’t it?

          YouTube is a terrible music platform.

          YouTube videos aren’t worth that much.

          If I’m paying for streaming video content, I prefer to pay the creators directly than let YouTube take an outsize cut.

          YouTube has hundreds of times the reach of any other comparable service. They’re milking their monopoly. They can bite a dick.

          • Remmock@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            But you don’t pay them directly. Hardly anybody does, except YouTube and whatever midroll sponsor they can hack a deal with. That’s WHY content creators insisted on paydays through YouTube to begin with and why YouTube is trying to make enough money to pay them all and look profitable.

              • Remmock@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Most Creators have communities where you can voice that desire if they don’t give you the information outright. Some do it through having companies of their own. Merch, coffee, and alcohol are common salespoints. JackSepticeye has a coffee brand and shares a clothing brand with Markiplier. Phillip De Franco also has a coffee brand and a clothing brand. Devin Stone (LegalEagle) doesn’t, but he’s part of the following push:

                Some are on other platforms that more directly reward the content creators, like Nebula. This allows them to have a Patreon-like model where some content is publicly available to drum up interest while other deeper or more long-form content exists behind a paywall. Communicate in communities with your favorite creators to find out how you can show them your support more specifically.

        • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’d agree that people love the tag-name ‘’Premium’’ therefore might pay for it. I’d also say tech-illiterate people will pay for it because of no knowledge.

          However most of the general public do find the price-tag absurd.

          Also your ‘’€18/monthly is a bargain’’ just makes me think, I’m arguing with a teenager or at least someone who does not pay for themselves (a friend or family member pays for most of things, I suppose). €18/monthly is €216/yearly, that money can be spent elsewhere, important things (food, education and bills).

          Not only that you are essentially saying ‘’Hey, Google. You the one who already owns most of the things, you the owner who’s already A billionaire and have immense data of its users – take more money of me’’. Google is essentially evil in the sense that their track-record isn’t clean. Their ways to gain profit/revenue is not really morally nor ethically right. They can just do it because they are one of the biggest companies in the world.

          I personally do not care if YouTube blocks itself for me, that just means – I will find another way to gain access to music and videos. There will always be ways, always.

          • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I love how people who disagree with your value assessment are all technology illiterate. Just hand wave away all your problems 🤣.

            You’re arguing with a 40 year old with commits to Apache, Python, CNCF, NGinx, TF, and more. So again, your hand waving away because of a different opinion is quite off base.

            To address the comment, none of that matters at all and is irrelevant. Yes you can keep on stealing the content and you shouldn’t be shocked every time Google finds a new way to make it more of a pain in the ass. I’m not sure why that’s a difficult concept for most of the readership here.

            • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              “Lets just say that person is tech-illiterate without actual knowledge about the particular person - because I have no counterargument”

              That what I just read from you.

              I’ll just block and ignore you, you’ve proven to be a total troll. Wasted enough of my time and energy on you. Unfortunately.

              ETA: if you’re truly 40 y/o, your behavior doesn’t show it. You are behaving like a teenager with the same mentality/mindset as one.

              Stealing is entirely different than using an AdBlock. With your “knowledge” in technology, you should know that by now. The question of “is piracy stealing” is a whole another topic which can be argued to infiniteness.

            • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              What in the world is motivating you to justify YouTube’s corpo enshittification? If you’re telling the truth, you’re easily old enough to realise that Baron Google isn’t going to share his wealth with useful idiots. Why would you spend your weekend extolling overpriced subscription services and berating ad avoiders on Google’s behalf?

                • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  But why the finger wagging? I get that you’d drop in and say “I prefer to pay for premium rather than play cat-and-mouse with Google” but that point was made long ago.

                  • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Finger wagging? I came in and said it’s completely expected for Google to block users and this is somehow controversial.

        • Remmock@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t generally agree with the corporate side of the argument, but financial support for the platform itself has to come from somewhere.

    • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thank you for your concern, but I have other ways of avoiding YouTube’s ads and associated punishments.

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        6 months ago

        Neat. None of you really understand the point or can read.

        Don’t expect YouTube to cater to you people who just steal 🤷‍♂️

        Whats so complicated?

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes. You people just cost money. Pay, or find a new service. I’m not so sure what’s confusing about this.

      I already pay, with my data. They stop to harvest data, I pay the service.

      Google isn’t going to let you use the service for free anymore.

      And I am not going to pay to be the product.

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        You 👏 don’t 👏 dictate 👏 the 👏 terms 👏 and 👏 price 👏👏.

        My God, you people 🤦‍♂️.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Maybe not the price, but the terms yes, at least partially, which are that I use an adblocker or I don’t use the service. Or pay for a service in which I am the customer and not the product.

          And I am really curious to see how Google can force me to use Youtube on its terms when I can simply stop using it.

    • arvere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree with you. Google is a company and so will do as much as they can to provide as little and to profit as much as possible.

      if one wants to use their products, they have to play their game. by either paying (with money and or data, regardless if it’s overpriced) or “cheating” around that - as we do with literally everything else in the free market system, to many other monopolistic shady companies

      what’s interesting to see around here is this sense of self entitlement, as if Google owed them anything, and of naivety, as if a company would ever provide a service (which is very costly) for absolutely free. video streaming is not an essential service and didn’t exist until very recently

      it may come as a shock, but you don’t need to use any service such as YouTube to survive and you only do because you want to and find value in it (whether to learn new skills or watch people reacting to cats)

      the underlying problem here which all of you are actually mad about is the system where technology and knowledge belongs to giant hoarding dragons instead of the people who made it. that’s where we all should be focusing our energy on.

      in the meantime, we just keep cheating… and if the cheats fail, we move on to other things