So I’ve realized that in conversations I’ll use traditional terms for men as general terms for all genders, both singularly and for groups. I always mean it well, but I’ve been thinking that it’s not as inclusive to women/trans people.

For example I would say:

“What’s up guys?” “How’s it going man?” "Good job, my dude!” etc.

Replacing these terms with person, people, etc sounds awkward. Y’all works but sounds very southern US (nowhere near where I am located) so it sounds out of place.

So what are some better options?

Edit: thanks for all the answers peoples, I appreciate the honest ones and some of the funny ones.

The simplest approach is to just drop the usage of guys, man, etc. Folks for groups and mate for singular appeal to me when I do want to add one in between friends.

  • PM_me_trebuchets@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m AFAB enby, saying “you guys” and calling me “dude” is fine. Those to me aren’t gendered anymore. The people who get offended at general terms like these for groups of people need to touch grass.

    But if you’re dead set on it, embrace y’all lol. Just don’t say it with a southern drawl and you’ll be fine. It’s a fantastic gender neutral term. You can also just train yourself not to add in the “you guys” to the “what’s up” phrase, and maybe just say “what’s up with you?” “What’s up with you all?” Etc.

    • lembas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Offended” is a bit of a strong word.

      Many trans folks are, understandably, bummed out when gendered terms that refer to their AGAB are used to refer to them.

      I don’t think there’s anything wrong with trying to avoid causing that brief moment of dysphoria. That just feels like a thoughtful and kind thing to do.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It’s context-dependent. “They” as gender-neutral was also considered context-dependent until recently.

        • “I met someone and they said…” would have been accepted generally
        • “I met a woman and they said…” is only recently acceptable.
        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I agree that it can sometimes be gender neutral. I do not agree that it is gender neutral.

          Referring to a group of people with a trans woman in it as “you guys” is passive aggressive for example.

          • jsomae@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It would be worse to treat trans women differently than other women.

            Some people object to this usage of “you guys.” Some people also object to “y’all.” I know someone who dislikes “y’all” because it reminds them of confederacy and slavery.

            If there is someone who expresses discomfort with certain words, it’s usually best to avoid those words in their presence.

            By the way, nobody can be expected to know whether or not a woman they are talking to is transgender. “You guys” should not be avoided for the sake of trans women if it isn’t avoided for the sake of all women.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Literally a trans woman. It is also rude to cis women but cis women don’t really worry about being misgendered the same way.

              • jsomae@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Literally a cis woman. I’ll avoid calling you you guys. My trans friends approve of its usage though. I don’t find its usage rude when applied to me. Please don’t try to play the identity card just to win an argument.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Strange though, that when you ask most men how many dudes they’ve slept with suddenly, she’s not a dude…

      • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s a very big difference between “dude”, referring to someone you’re talking to, and “a dude”, referring to someone you were talking about.

          • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It’s like the difference between “my shit”, “your shit”, and “that shit”. You’re not actually referring to your own things as feces, or calling it “shitty”. It’s just your shit. As in “Don’t touch my shit”. But when you’re referring to someone else’s shit as “your shit” or “that shit” it’s more derogatory. Like, “clean up that shit” or “get your shit out of here”.

            The context changes “shit” from derogatory to neutral. Similarly, “dude” can be both gender specific and neutral depending on context.

            Note that people are still allowed to prefer not to be referred to as “dude”, but it’s a gender neutral term in many contexts nonetheless.

  • maxprime@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    A lot of people use “folks” for plural.

    I feel like “guys” is fairly un-gendered but people disagree with me. Personally, I haven’t used the word “guys” to refer to anything male in what seems like forever.

    “Bud” and “fella” are good singulars.

    • unfnknblvbl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I really, really wish we could degender “guy” and “guys”. I know plenty of people of all genders that use the words in general to describe people, objects, concepts, everything. The only holdouts are people that insist on it specifically meaning males. Ironically, these people are often the hardcore feminists.

      If other English words can change their meanings and be claimed/reclaimed by certain groups, why can’t others?

      Take guy! Use it to describe whatever you want! Free it of its historically phallic shackles!

      • ready_for_qa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Guy was originally gender neutral as it was used to call someone stupidly bold (iirc). The term was most often used toward a single gender that was known for being stupidly bold and became synonymous with that gender. That’s how it became gendered.

    • MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m a cis woman in IT, I’m guy, dude, man, bro… I don’t really care. You can change to make a specific person feel more confortable but most woman don’t care to be dude or guy