• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    Announced immediately after they updated their terms to require forced arbitration and removes all your rights to sue for damages.

    HOW FUCKING CONVENIENT.

    Throw your roku devices in the trash.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think forced arbitration should be illegal. I’m suing an old employer. They had an arbitration clause hidden in the contract. It just allows them to ignore federal Eeoc laws since they can just arbitrate it.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It just allows them to ignore federal Eeoc laws since they can just arbitrate it.

        That sounds suspect. EEOC is federal. I find it doubtful a company can simply choose to opt-out of those laws.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          They can. The Feds can sue on behalf of you but thy rarely do. They admitted in writing they ignore the ada since they can’t be sue. Judge still forced it to arbitration.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          When I talk about working with senators. This is one of the topics I’m discussing. Federal laws should not be forced into arbitration. It allows companies to abuse federal law

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Arbitration should only be allowed when you get something for it. They’ll give you 10k for going to arbitration or something. Otherwise it’s just abusive or you get to pick the arbitrator.