• Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Weird how y’all haven’t figured it out yet considering Finland has and Germany has had nuclear power plants for longer.

    But I suspect it’s more of a lack of wanting to do what’s needed for storage because ‘politics’ and boomers than it is because it’s not possible.

    • Sniatch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Could be that Finland is a big country with only 5,5 million people living there compared to 83million in germany. Easier to find a place.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, and like most of Europe, that German population lives in cities, not random forests and mountains in the middle of nowhere where you could also do underground storage like Finland has done.

        Not to mention Germany has more land.

        • Sniatch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Don’t you think it sounds crazy to build a underground storage just to have it closed for a million years. I just can’t understand why anybody would want that.

              • Forester@yiffit.netOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Well you see we kinda are failing at the whole mitigating climate change issue and we and we only have so many rare earth minerals to exploit for large scale battery storage banks. And every year we are burning more Fossil Fuels and shutting down more reactors and building no new modern designs and giving nuclear none of the funding the fossil fuel industry receives or the renewables industry receives.