• Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    My argument is that neither side should invade the other and that they should peacefully coexist. I support peace, balanced reconciliation, and the end of capitalism.

        • PandaBearGreen [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seem contradictory to use charged language like 'appeasement '. And then to say you want everyone to coexist peacefully. It seems to advocate for containment which isn’t peaceful coexistence.

          • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Would you explain what the contradiction is between a desire for peace and an opposition to imperialism?

            If “containment of x” means “making it harder for x to invade” then yes, I am advocating for that so long as the ends justify the means, and yes, that is peaceful coexistence. If you have a personal problem with that, then I don’t care. But it’s a perfectly coherent philosophy.