What do you think?

  • Wolfeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Thoughts, yes. Please keep in mind that thoughts are not necessarily in the form of a voice, even in humans.

  • Noxy@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why would anyone think that thought is unique to humans? Seems absurd to a frightening degree.

    • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The voice in my head requires complex language and symbolism. I don’t doubt that they’re capable of thought, just like Helen Keller was capable of thought before having language, but I doubt that it’s like the “little voice” in my head.

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Not sure about thoughts, but cats are interesting in their level of committment to their intent when they “decide” they want to do something. They are laser-focused and its hard to actually meaningfully distract them from the execution once the order’s been placed haha.

    Watch them sometime. Cat.exe are very deiberate little critters. It reminds me of when you hit the share sheet on iOS but you change your mind and try desperately to navigate away from it popping up or hoping you can cancel out the instruction but nope. Its coming

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not everyone has a voice in their head. Do you have a cat? Cats have thoughts. Unfortunately that thought is sometimes, “eff you, human!”

  • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    They don’t have language, so they can’t have the internal dialogue.

    But can they have imagination? Since many animals have dreams, then why not?

    • lemmy_99c4zb3e3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What about the deaf and dumb? Language is not just spoken words. Maybe animals have their own kind of internal dialogues like deaf people.

  • rowinxavier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    No, but that is because they don’t have language.

    That said, plenty of humans do not have a voiced internal experience. The lack of language does not imply a lack of cognition. I would expect that the brain of a closely related organism, say a chimp, would have many similar experiences generated by the same stimuli. Would they experience green like I experience green? I can’t even say that about a person sitting next to me, but they probably have an equivalent experience.

    That said, if we had a way of communicating could we reach agreed terms? I can do that with my cat, so I would think he has an understanding of me and my behaviours along with what tends to happen when I do certain things like clap then shake my hands at the end of a treat session. He knows there are no more treats, he associates that with my hands clapping and shaking, so we communicate. Does he have a voice in his head describing it? Probably not. Does he have Meows? Again, probably not, but he would have a sense and memories of previous times.

    • Noxy@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      they don’t have language

      Have you never seen a dog wag their tail or play bow?

      Have you never seen a squirrel twitching their tail at another squirrel who’s encroached on their territory?

      Have you never encountered any media about whale songs?

      All kinds of animals have all kinds of language.

      • rowinxavier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I meant to say language in the linguistics sense, a series of abstract items which can be arranged to convey arbitrary meaning. For example, a dog barking can be a threat display, a warning, playful, sad, afraid, and so on. But can you use barking to create grammar? With grammar you could have labels for items in the world and use various barks to refer to them, make requests, ask questions, and so on. Some types of animals have warning calls that are specific to types of predators, for example an eagle call or a leopard call. Leopards require different responses than eagles so the distinction is very useful and helps others to respond. This is not quite language but is definitely a step in the right direction.

        So yes, you are correct, lots of animals can communicate things to each other, but it is not the same as language like what humans have. Could we find an animal that does have language? Or something very close? Sure, but we haven’t shown that yet. Maybe we should focus on giving other animals a chance to develop before we wipe them all out.

        • Noxy@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          but it is not the same as language like what humans have

          And it doesn’t have to be. In fact this sort of thinking can limit how we learn about other animals.

          Dogs don’t pass the mirror test for self awareness like some corvids and a few other animals do. But dogs don’t experience each other primarily through vision, scent is much more their main sense. So is that even a valid test for canid self awareness?

  • Iapar@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Animals have thoughts, that is clear as day.

    Inner Monolog? In a way. But not like us because they don’t speak English motherfucker.

  • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    One of My strongest memories is watching a documentary where they claimed dogs don’t dream, and my dogs directly in front of the TV making little sleep barks and moving legs deep into some dream.

    Let’s be honest we are animals and the rest aren’t all that far behind us.

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            What’s driving me wild about these claims is I DON’T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK PEOPLE EVEN MEAN with “inner monologue”. And none of those stupid articles seems to bother to first and foremost try to define what the fuck they are writing about. A definition of the word…

            • illi@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              It’s like talking to yourself, but not vocalizing it. At least that’s how I understand it

              • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I still don’t know whether that means my absolutely everyday way to think the words I am typing right now, or if some people can actually hear their “inner voice” like in a movie voiceover when the protagonists thoughts are narrated in the protagonist’s voice. Or do people have a “dialogue” in their heads? I mean that never occurred to me because at least that part of "mono"logue is clear…

                • illi@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Pretty much the inner voice thing. Like you are talking yourself through what you are doing, commenting internally on what you see and stuff.