A record number of athletes openly identifying as LGBTQ+ are competing in the 2024 Paris Olympics, a massive leap during a competition that organizers have pushed to center around inclusion and diversity.

There are 191 athletes publicly saying they are gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, queer and nonbinary who are participating in the Games, according to Outsports, an organization that compiles a database of openly queer Olympians. The vast majority of the athletes are women.

That number has quashed the previous record of 186 out athletes counted at the COVID-19-delayed Tokyo Olympics held in 2021, and the count is only expected to grow at future Olympics.

“More and more people are coming out,” said Jim Buzinski, co-founder of Outsports. “They realize it’s important to be visible because there’s no other way to get representation.”

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What you’re saying is, that trans women/girls who have gone through a transition before puberty are physically equal to born women. You clearly agree that there must be some regulation at least onto when the transition happened.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The sports organizations which allow trans atheletes do exactly that. Example:

      https://www.aclu.org/wp-content/uploads/legal-documents/049-9_exhibit_i.pdf

      “the International Olympic Committee (IOC) determined criteria by which a transgender woman may be eligible to compete in the female category, requiring total serum testosterone levels to be suppressed below 10 nmol/L for at least 12 months prior to and during competition.”

      Good enough for the Olympics? Good enough for me!

    • bouldering_barista@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      I didn’t say that, but the point I was getting across was that systemglitch is drawing this black and white box that isn’t the world we live in.

      People have different kinds of transition stories and that’s OK. As of today the Olympics does have regulations in place. I’m not an expert on what those are, I just know they do take into consideration more than what systemglitch is thinking they should do. (Also, intersex people do exist and again these are situations the Olympics has to account for.)

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sorry to correct, but it absolutely is the world we live in. You’re fighting to change it.

        End of the day, transitioning has many downsides and massive toll. Sorry, but maybe competing has to be one of them. Your example of pre puberty child that then goes to compete doesn’t exist, right? Every example brought up is about someone who transitioned after their bodies were “done” growing.

        As you said, don’t paint it black and white when there is whole lot of grey on both sides.

        • rekorse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Why does competing need to be a downside of transitioning? Why does transitioning need any or more downsides?

          The original post in this thread was entirely black and white, saying it should be decided at birth. Where’s the nuance there?

          Where are the trans athletes that are ruining female sports at? Shouldnt we have at least something real to be afraid of? What about men’s sports? Noone wants to talk about trans males for some reason, why dont you take issue with them?

          • Paddzr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Simply, tough.

            I’m not writing an essay to address your numerous of accusations because that’s been done to death. You’re not interested anyway and only want to argue in bad faith. You’re just fishing for a gotcha. If all you want is a reason for you to justify dismissing comments, why not just move on?

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        There’s also the fact that there are hormone variations across cisgender people.

        Wasn’t there some sort of controversy a few years ago where a cis woman participant(cant remember if it was the olympics or not)tested high in her natural testosterone levels and was prevented from competing because it gave her an advantage or something?

        So it’s possible for some cis women to have naturally higher testosterone levels than some trans women.

        Hormones are a lot more complex than we think and I feel like all these keyboard endocrinologists are overconfident in their understanding of hormones and how they effect the body.

        Experts are still studying this stuff, and if they say there’s no significant advantage I’m inclined to believe them. Besides, most anti trans people didn’t give a fuck about women’s sports until it gave them an opportunity to be hateful.

        • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          This.

          Trust the expert and the studies. Opinions equals shit against the reality.