Why does competing need to be a downside of transitioning? Why does transitioning need any or more downsides?

The original post in this thread was entirely black and white, saying it should be decided at birth. Where’s the nuance there?

Where are the trans athletes that are ruining female sports at? Shouldnt we have at least something real to be afraid of? What about men’s sports? Noone wants to talk about trans males for some reason, why dont you take issue with them?

Children tend to have parity up until a certain point, I believe thats where some of the concern is at.

Why do you think the exact gender needs to be nailed down right at birth?

They can’t openly use grindr. I’m sure theres plenty of stealth profiles on there.

Thats the best thing about them, still great the lazy way.

If I’m feeling extra though, I’ll brush some oil on it and salt it, maybe some other random seasonings.

I almost had them tasting like dunkin hashbrowns once, was very nice.

Air fryer cuts it in half.

Can I shit on air fryers for a second though.

How did everyone just accept this horrible example of marketing and branding nonsense? I literally had relatives explaining it to me like it was a magical new way of cooking just invented.

Its a fucking tiny convection oven.

Here’s the problem. How to get the average person to think far enough into the future to understand why the data collection is almost always a bad thing for them.

In most cases it will save you in the long run to avoid the app discounts than to use them.

Only reason to go there now is because they’ve tricked my kids into being addicted to it.

Didnt five guys double their prices? I understand they CAN make good burgers, although they won’t cook them to the right temperature for me (back when I did eat meat) for safety reasons, but is it worth it?

Is that person rounding or are mcdoubles really 5$ a piece now?

Warning! This definitely reads like a taco bell add but I just really appreciate taco bell for having food for vegans and not price gouging like the rest did.

Hard disagree, if you learn what to order and how to customize your food.

Fat ass burritos for 3.50 are not a bad deal imo, and I regularly make my own burritos at home.

They have some trap items to avoid for sure, but the staples are still cheap. Hard shell and soft shell, rice and bean burritos, nacho fries are sort of in the middle price wise, etc.

They are the easiest place for me to make a vegan order from hands down, they actually label shit on their order tablets. They have some freebies that are totally worth it some people never find out about because they order at the speaker exclusively. Fresco replaces cheese and dairy with a pico de gallo, you can toast most regular burritos, and even though its extra you can add nearly anything into anything for super cheap.

Im actually not sure if I’m scamming them somehow because choosing their cheapest items and modifying is always cheaper than buying the same thing but premade. Not in any rush to ask about it either.

Never said it had to. Are you going to engage with anything I said or just call me stupid?

I use aegis for the MFA portion.

Is this just a really bad business deal followed by absurdly poor leadership, but very visible?

Did Elon make it obvious he had a completely different vision for twitter when he talked about buying it?

To be fair your question was phrased a bit confusingly. It was hard to tell if you were asking clarification or supporting Elon in some strange way.

Might not be popular but you dont want to restrict that type of stuff in tech, because people very quickly and easily find ways around it, usually by using new similar words that call back to the prohibited ones.

This is an area where moderation is key, and I think people might need to reconsider who they allow to send them direct messages. Especially I expect there to be a better way to vet someone who is trying to directly reach a stranger.

If you are literally going to open your door to the whole world some bad stuff will fall in, but you dont have to let them into your private areas just because they made it in the front door.

Trust networks are another idea, essentially verifying new people through acquaintances.

Those cars in your poverty stricken area were meticulously maintained? Or is it more likely they were just endlessly repaired.

Those are two entirely different arguments. Poor people repair cars because thats their only option.

Poor people dont maintain cars well because they can’t afford it. You ride shit until it breaks and fix it the best you can.

Apparently everyone in your neighborhood worked in the auto industry.

The article is saying that instead of hiring more people, companies are trying to use AI to get the same output with less people. This leads to lost jobs.

Its not common people are actually fired and directly replaced by AI, but what happens is the normal turnover keeps turning but they won’t replace the lost jobs with as many people as before.

Personally I dont want to support any non-human created art in any field, although I think there are use cases for AI in other fields.

Why can’t we analyze AI on its own merits? We dont base our decisions on whether an idea is more or less polluting than automobiles. We can look at what we are getting for what’s being put into it.

The big tech companies could scrap their AI tech today and it wouldnt change most peoples lives.

They aren’t just taking water noone was using.

This is the stupidest shit ive seen yet.

We dont care about other data centers as much because we get a service in return that people want.

Most people didnt ask for or want AI, didnt agree to its costs, and now have to deal with it potentially taking their jobs.

But go ahead and keep posting idiotic and selfish posts about how you like it so much and its so fun and cool, look at my shitty song lyrics that make no fucking sense!

I’d say touch grass but the lyrics make me want to say touch instrument instead.