Fewer*
This distinction was first tentatively suggested by the grammarian Robert Baker in 1770, and it was eventually presented as a rule by many grammarians since then. However, modern linguistics has shown that idiomatic past and current usage consists of the word less with both countable nouns and uncountable nouns so that the traditional rule for the use of the word fewer stands, but not the traditional rule for the use of the word less.
I love that there’s a wikipedia page on this.
I hate that doing the wrong thing consistently automatically makes it the right thing.
Maybe you should read the article, especially the section on historical usage. Saying ‘less’ was never wrong, there was just a bunch of fancy academics that came along once and said it’s wrong, while everyone else just carried on as usual.
I was just stirring the pot, and I love this response
Yeah but the summary could be lesser words.
‘Under’ would have worked and been shorter.
or, take a different spin.
“Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League season three debuts to over 200 Steam players!”
≤
The 24 hours peak players was just under 250. The headline using “300” is understating things.
Suicide Squad: Less interesting than discussing linguistics xD
Linguistics is cool AF! A lot of people think (I certainly used to) English is a romance language, sharing as much as it does from French. But it is Germanic!
While something like 90% of the dictionary owes itself to French in loan words, 95% of the most commonly used words, and the Grammer by which they’re used, belongs to the Germanic language family!
Fun linguistics fact for ya! Now you don’t have to play that game.
