Bishopric of Basel admits mistakes in sex abuse case
I’m curious if they followed the US roadmap. When the US Catholic Church realized they had a sex abuse problem back in the 80’s, they took immediate action … and bought sex abuser insurance for every diocese and archdiocese in the entire country, destroyed a bunch of documentation on the abuse, moved other files to Washington DC where they could be covered by diplomatic immunity, and continued to move abusive priests to fresh churches with no warning to the congregation, and moving worse offenders overseas, out of reach of the Justice Department. All the while, they also restructured local and regional churches to ensure that each was it’s own individual entity, and that as many of the assets as possible were completely untouchable.
If they get sued, they deny everything, fight every request for discovery, attack the victims’ characters, and say it must have been an isolated incident. If forced to pay out, they rely on those extremely low-premium high-payout insurance policies they bought; if the payout goes beyond what’s covered by insurance, the church pleads poverty because all the assets are ‘owned’ by some other entity, and if pressed they’ll declare local bankruptcy.
I’m curious if they followed the US roadmap. When the US Catholic Church realized they had a sex abuse problem back in the 80’s, they took immediate action … and bought sex abuser insurance for every diocese and archdiocese in the entire country, destroyed a bunch of documentation on the abuse, moved other files to Washington DC where they could be covered by diplomatic immunity, and continued to move abusive priests to fresh churches with no warning to the congregation, and moving worse offenders overseas, out of reach of the Justice Department. All the while, they also restructured local and regional churches to ensure that each was it’s own individual entity, and that as many of the assets as possible were completely untouchable.
If they get sued, they deny everything, fight every request for discovery, attack the victims’ characters, and say it must have been an isolated incident. If forced to pay out, they rely on those extremely low-premium high-payout insurance policies they bought; if the payout goes beyond what’s covered by insurance, the church pleads poverty because all the assets are ‘owned’ by some other entity, and if pressed they’ll declare local bankruptcy.
Not that I’m bitter or anything …
I know a guy who swears he heard people in the early 70s talk about pedo priests.