• GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Calling out whataboutism is perfectly acceptable when it is being used regardless of its origins.

      It is in no way a logical fallacy and in fact the use of whataboutism is itself a logical fallacy.

      The flaw in gorilladrum’s argument is that the hypothetical example demonstrates the flaws in that specific situation and does not address problems in socialism as a whole yet they suggest it dismisses the ideology completely.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        People cry whataboutism when they dislike people throwing context that goes against their argument into a discussion.

        • Gorilladrums@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only people who feel threatned by others calling out fallacies are the ones who know they’re disingenuous but still act in bad faith anyway.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s literally whataboutism, I criticized people using the vocabulary of “whataboutism” and then you said “but whatabout people who are doing whataboutism!”

            To be clear, I dont believe whataboutism is a fallacy, but you do, so why are you doing it?