Authorities have arrested the man suspected of killing of Baltimore tech entrepreneur Pava LaPere, a U.S. Marshal confirmed, as police announced plans to reveal details of the capture following a major manhunt.

Baltimore police said they planned to announce the “arrest of murder suspect Jason Billingsley” in a news conference at 11 a.m. ET Thursday. No further details were released and police did not immediately respond to requests for comment from NBC News early Thursday.

Deputy U.S. Marshal Albert Maresca Jr. confirmed Billingsley’s arrest to Baltimore-based NBC affiliate WBAL-TV. He said the suspect, who is 32, was apprehended at a train station in Bowie, Maryland.

  • PenguinJuice@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Letting people out/off early is a problem. From what I understand, Illinois has eliminated cash bail, which has made crime way worse.

    Edit: This site has a huge problem with people being loud about things they know nothing about. I know people who live in Chicago who are an active part of their community and crime has gone up insanely. There are a bunch of emergency meetings about the significant increase in armed robbery and carjackings. Apparently to people on this site, the comfort and feelings of criminals matter more than innocent people who are just trying to get by in their own community.

    This obsession with being soft on criminals is so backwards and fucked up. Anyone who defends this is delusional and a threat to a safe society.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/chicagos-crime-problem-is-about-to-get-worse

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      DEMONRAT CITIES HAVE PROSECUTORS LINING UP TO FREE MURDERERS AND EVERYONE ON THE STREET IS BEING MUGGED AND DRUGGED ITS TIME FOR ALL PATRIOTS TO MOVE TO RED STATES AND ELECT FREEDOM LOVING TRUMP AND HIS HAMBERDER WALL

      is how I read your comment

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        THEYR GONNA MAKE IT ILLEGAL TO LOVE JESUS AND BE STRAIGHT SOON AND THEN THEYRE GONNA PAY PEOPLE TO SHOOT STRIWFJT CHRISTIANS

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Letting people out/off early is a problem.

      Do you honestly think spending an extra 15 years surrounded by other violent criminals is going to reduce the chance of him re-offending?

      Do you even know why people are being let out on parole early in the first place? It’s because we’ve been tougher on crime than any other wealthy nation in the world for the last 50 years, and now we have more prisoners than prison space.

      • Nataratata@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Someone who tortures (including rape) or kills other people should not be allowed back into society, in my opinion. We can’t just continue to tell all the victims “Ah well, shit happens!”

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Someone who tortures (including rape) or kills other people

          That is a more specific stance than “all violent criminal” that op claimed. And if we had a perfect Justice system that could accurately determine guilt with absolute certainty, I would be more likely to agree with you.

          However, our penal system has been utilized as weapon to oppression minority and political oppression for around 150 years now, and an indefinite sentence is simply a a worse slower execution.

      • PenguinJuice@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t care about them being rehabilitated. I care about keeping dangerous criminals off the streets.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The best way to keep dangerous criminals off the street is to rehabilitate the criminals… Or better yet, remove the economic environmental conditions that drive people to crime in the first place.

          What’s your alternative? Are we just throwing anybody who gets in a bar fight in prison for the rest of their lives?

          If your idea of “justice” worked America would already be the safest place on earth. Despite America only making up around 4% of the population we house 20% of the global prison population . If you’re ideology actually made us safe, don’t you think it would have worked by now?

    • DLSchichtl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This site has a huge problem with people being loud about things they know nothing about.

      Fair

      I know people who live in Chicago who are an active part of their community and crime has gone up insanely.

      Dude shut up. Don’t bitch about people talking out of their asses then offer up some trite anecdote that inexplicably supports your argument.

      • PenguinJuice@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t follow your narrative, of course you’re butthurt by it. Dunno why it’s so popular to defend criminals nowadays but definitely shows the flawed mentality that’s so pervasive

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          doesn’t follow your narrative, of course you’re butthurt by it.

          What narrative? The entire idea of a rehabilitation based penal system has been native to the American justice system since we built our first prison.

          Your narrative is a modern neocon revision of historical fact. It doesn’t follow a logic, it’s just an attempt to utilize the power of the state against anyone you hold prejudice against.

          Dunno why it’s so popular to defend criminals nowadays

          No one is defending individual criminals, were defending the American people. When you strip the rights away from fellow americans, you are stripping away your own rights.

          Let’s say hypothetically you pass a bill that throws dangerous criminals away forever. What stops you from being labeled a dangerous criminal?

          flawed mentality that’s so pervasive

          Says the boy who thinks that keeping people in prison longer makes them less dangerous…

          • PenguinJuice@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bro, you’re defending criminals. I’m not having a discussion with you because there’s none to be had. Just by defending criminals you tell me all I need to know about your opinions.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Bro, you’re defending criminals.

              Lol, and you’re promoting endless incarceration… something unequivocally worse then defending criminal.

              I’m not having a discussion with you because there’s none to be had.

              Your not having a discussion because you don’t have any original thoughts on the subject. You’re just regurgitating fascist propaganda.

              • PenguinJuice@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m defending being a citizen who does not engage in violence, theft or crime in general. I absolutely think prioritizing those people’s needs should be prioritized over those who engage in those acts. Why is defending that class of citizen so bad?

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  defending being a citizen who does not engage in violence, theft or crime in general.

                  Incarceration is inherently an act of violence. Subjecting someone to undue imprisonment is enacting more violence upon someone then an assault or any theft.

                  absolutely think prioritizing those people’s needs should be prioritized over those who engage in those acts.

                  They are the same people… rehabilitating people who engage in violent crime is done for the benefit of society, not the prisoner.

                  Why is defending that class of citizen so bad?

                  Because thats not a class of people? Every class of people engage with criminal behavior, it’s just the poor who can’t afford to buy “justice”.

                  Your problem is that you think criminal behavior is a product of self discipline or morality, when in reality it is a product of environment and circumstance. Your naive beliefs inhibits the very possibility that people can change or be rehabilitated. Tbh everything you’ve said just sounds like a thinly veiled dog whistle.

        • Nataratata@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because a lot of the people here never were the victim of a crime and think they never will be. Crime is something that happens “to others”. Especially sex crimes like rape is something people here feel especially apologetic for. Those poor rapists… I wonder why that is.