• 2 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 22nd, 2024

help-circle
  • 33550336@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlElections
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    I think that’s a fair take and perhaps indicates you’d lean anarchist-left.

    I perceive myself as a social democrat, maybe with elements of anarchism, such as decentralization and down-to-up elements of organization.

    I have mixed feelings myself, that kind of natural transformation won’t just be left alone to evolve, it’ll be actively resisted by powerful political and global forces, the United States and its allies would not allow it, for example.

    This problem is actually a hard one – otherwise no one wouldn’t need to argue about it, and there is no simple choice. If someone thinks that there is an obvious simple solution, then he/her may be just very ignorant. Maybe I will sound controversial here, but in contrast to Marxist-Leninist, I do not blame United States for damping revolution. Revolution will not come simply because we are not in 19th century capitalism anymore. Capitalists adapted, provided more humane conditions to workers to not be swept by workers’ revolution, and Antonio Gramsci saw it something like 100 years ago, but Marxist-Leninists still live in 19th century and do not see that low-income class would rather choose far-right options like Trump or AfD. The United States indeed massively interfered with damping of “socialists” republics in South America, but I think we do not need another “red” imperialism country like USSR or Russia’s vassal. Humanity needs real communism, not “red” authoritarianism.

    I think this pretty clearly demonstrated that the USSR wasn’t interested in anything but Empire.

    I think so, and with time this was becoming more and more obvious. Western leftists were surprisingly long (like 1956) under the charm of USSR, maybe with an exception of people like Emma Goldman.


  • 33550336@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlElections
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    This sounds like western chauvinism. Hoe can you be sure?

    And how can you be sure? Given nontransparent smokescreen of all red imperialist countries like USSR, China and North Korea?

    The other was democratically elected

    Oh yes, USSR, the famous standard of democracy /s

    end the holocaust

    *replace it with the gulag system


  • 33550336@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlElections
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    The term is wide and sometimes misinterpreted, but actually not meaningless, since tankies are mainly associated with marxism-leninism (maybe sometimes maoism) and whitewashing of regimes as China, USSR, or North Korea. Same as the term “woke”, which is even wider and horribly overused. Thus, I wouldn’t call a western postmarxist leftist a tankie, and a lib or neocon probably would call this person a woke one :)


  • 33550336@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlElections
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Yes, Marxists have been on Lemmy.ml and this is a good thing. But there is difference between Marxists and supporters of authoritarian regimes like China, Russia or North Korea, who are denialists of genocides like Bucha, Katyn, Tiananmen, etc. and who are cheap wumao/govnoyed propagandists.


  • 33550336@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlElections
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    The “tankie bubble” is Lemmy.

    Not so. The tankiest instances are lemmygrad and hexbear, while I think sh.itjust.works is neocon or lib at best, not to mention nazi “exploding heads” so we have a whole spectrum. I think Lemmy.ml had tolerable tankiness, but since lemmygrad and hexbear were rightly defederated from most instances, the tankies and wumaos are poisoning Lemmy.ml and much of fediverse with genocide denialism, authoritarian propaganda, etc.


  • 33550336@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlElections
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    Thank you for a quite objective response.

    I also see how a state which transforms into socialism or communism must be “authoritarian” in that it has to take away factories and land from those that keep it as capital, so that it can be shared.

    I think this will never work, or with a very small probability. Power simply corrupts and attracts a nasty kind of people. Personally, I believe that upwards, organic, evolutionary changes are more probable to bring us closer to the ideas of communism, as industrial evolution moved most of the world from feudalism into capitalism in a natural way.


  • 33550336@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlElections
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Yeah, I’ve heard about the white terror. This does not justify people who supposedly wanted a better world. I am quite sure that now amount of torture in western countries is negligible when compared with China and North Korea, and mostly by intrinsic flaws of e.g. police than political causes. And yes, I’ve heard about exceptions as Guantanamo or Pinoshit. Actually Pinoshit and Franco should not be counted as nominal western mindset, since they are authoritarian fascist piece of shits. I despise all authoritarian despots equally, no matter fascist Franco or “communist” Stalin.







  • 33550336@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlElections
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    the most powerful and influential countries

    these countries tend to dominate over other countries as they dominate over their own citizens. this should never be a goal. countries should be democratic between themselves as their citizens should be.