Depending on what you have a taste for, I seem to remember seeing this in Emacs:

https://github.com/magit/forge

Why is anyone even still using Xitter at all? Those that still do are part of the problem and have no real excuse for supporting the Nazi site.

I know when I hear a con talking about “freedom” and “liberty” they are talking about the Southern notion of those terms, not the meaning most people are thinking of.

They won’t be happy just ruining one shithole state.

These guys are for “liberty” like the Ministry of Truth is a bastion of truth.

Long overdue - by more than 10 years really - that it’s done at the federal level.

Yes, and all the dumbasses that rotated through his maladministration, only to fall out of favor or whatever and get dragged by donnie, too.

I like that someone on the IntarWebz called him “Deposition Karen”.

Yup. In states that are not swing states, why would those voters even bother?

My goodness, yes.

They get to vote, don’t they? They just don’t get to have their vote given extra privileges just because they live in a sparsely populated area, that’s all.

The cons really showed their hand more recently when arguing over things like suppressing the vote, and mail-in voting and telling everyone that “voting is not really a right enshrined in the Constitution”.

Well, tell us how you really feel.

It feels like a compromise from a period of time that is no longer relevant to these times when we are trying to push this country into the future. I don’t want rural regions to have more of a voice, FFS. Look at what it is doing to this country. Having fewer people have an equal say with the majority of the people is also not great, the majority should win out. Why the fuck should tracts of land be voting?

I’ve heard a lot of “nevers” in my lifetime. Legalizing cannabis. Overturning Roe.

rural areas that provide all of the food to the cities

I don’t understand this common argument and the framing that comes with it - as if they are doing it for free or for altruistic reasons.

Well, then, maybe we should start considering splitting up some states and joining others together then. A place like California is more future-minded and it’s where a great deal of the people are, as well as much of our economy. Also, it’s where a lot of our food is grown. And it gets 2 Senators.

The 2 Dakotas have more than that, and what do they really represent for the future of America and the world? More fracking?

Maybe states with really large masses and hardly anyone in them are combined. Idaho, Montana and Wyoming - one state. North Dakota, South Dakota and Nebraska, another.

Yeah, dawg forbid they change their platform to, you know, appeal to a majority of Americans…

Well, our campaigns are ridiculously antiquated with the campaign season being kicked off in…Iowa? And silly photo-ops of them eating county fair food and so on, as if that is somehow representative of America in the past several decades.

Sorry, most people are not farmers, and it’s absurd to pretend as if that is “middle America”.

It would make far more sense to kick things off on the coasts. Where all the people are.

Exactly. Now any Democrats in flyover states actually have their vote matter.

And that’s okay.