That’s been my experience. It’s weird seeing people get so angry at op over the assumption that op ignored fundamental information that is so often omitted by the manufacturers.

Weird. The last three TVs I bought didn’t have the foot width listed on the box.

Most TV’s don’t list the width on the feet on the packaging do they?

Well we already established it’s much of an assumption.

Yes indifference makes you cool. Caring about things is for losers. Any more grade school wisdom you’d like to impart?

Your only reply to the whole of the original post was who cares. The doxxing death threats and sexual harassment, who cares. You wanted to say that you were talking about a different part but you gave no context or indication for that when you just said who cares. How is that not indifference to human suffering? It really doesn’t seem like much of an assumption.

Enjoy being proud about being indifferent to human suffering.

I didn’t mention anything other than people that view others as humans would care that other humans are being harassed.

Being doxxed and getting death threats? Oh yeah that’s not cool but who cares?

Also, a more minor point relative to your stance that celebs aren’t human, but how on earth did you manage to equate a public persona with completely obfuscating ones identity or even creating a totally new identity?

People that view others as human.

Ah, you are correct. I had to reread it to finally parse it correctly.

Shouldn’t the “don’t” be outside the [ ] so that it applies to both sides of the or?

The YouTube algorithm is garbage. More than once it’s just completely removed channels I watch pretty much daily from my suggestions. The not interested filter is woefully inadequate as they have no idea what the actual reason for disinterest was. I still get 100 flavors of lofi videos in my suggestions despite flagging every single one. YouTube’s interpretation of that? Remove all other forms of music.

I’m late to the game but I just wanted to say that that is a solid choice.

Yeah that’s an issue that I would anticipate as well but at least now we are exploring options and identifying what may or may not work and what the trade offs are rather than pretending that it’s an impossibility like Mario was doing.

If an AR style didn’t provide an advantage then the military wouldn’t select designs like it.

A pretty simple how for that case would be to have a protected database where mental health professionals and institutions would report individuals with issues deemed worryng enough to bar from purchasing a gun. Then during the background check they would reference that db. If the person being checked is verified to be in that db fail the check. Maybe have some revaluation options or whatever but it’s not hard to imagine how reasonable laws that are actually enforced could actually help. The half baked laws that are half assed enforced and then held up as an example of any laws at all being fundamentally impossible just isn’t convincing.

So does that mean that you can get 1 micron accuracy as long as the part is sized to a multiple of the pixels width on the x and y? Is that just for aligned straight edges or can that be done for curves too?

Which printer is giving you 1 micron precision?

To be fair he might not like some people because they are black, trans, or little people regardless of if they are conservative or not.

Of all the options available to post covering this story why would you choose to direct traffic to fox news?