• anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I definitely feel the pain when it comes to worthless results nowadays. Though in this case DDG comes through:

    Adding documentation to the search makes the “correct” page soar to the top:

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Haha, nope. The links points to a table of contents after which you are on your own. The right link should point to a specific page instead, but the problem here is that postres docs are poorly optimized for search engines. If you click on the top link from google, you would see there’s a notice that the page is outdated, with a link to a current version, but said link is dead. It’s not an issue I’ve ever experienced with mysql docs for example.

      And yes, w3schools, despite how terrible it is, is still above the official docs because it is more popular with newbies. I remember a time when I just started, I preferred sites like it, because they were simple and on point, rather than technically correct and comprehensive like the official docs are. If you forgot the feeling, try learning math on wikipedia (assuming you don’t have a math degree).

      For the rest I cannot argue. Generated/AI shit is indeed ruining the internet and search engines giving up and joining them isn’t helpful either.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Trying to learn math on Wikipedia is an endless Sisyphean nightmare just trying to understand the first word in an unfamiliar vocabulary.

  • MrOxiMoron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    In desperation you click the link to the old docs, change the version to the latest version and pray you don’t get a 404

    • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Been there. Done that. FML on searching for programming help some days. Versioning is a nightmare as the way you “used” to do things is no longer relevant and the rest of the results are some asshole saying it is a duplicate question that was answered 10 years ago…that is no longer fucking relevant!

      Sorry. Yesterday sucked. I hope today is less frustration and more things working like they are supposed to.

      • theparadox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        As someone who is trying to teach themselves a few new things this year by diving to projects using them… I seriously, seriously feel you. It honestly makes me question whether I should just abandon each project I start, both professional and personal.

        All the relevant hits are from years and/or 2+ versions of whatever ago or forum posts with dead links to an alleged solution.

        I feel like in the past I could just dive into something and search my way through it. Now I feel like that era is over and I question whether it’s me, my niche project idea, the disappearing community, or just the search engines.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Multiple times I have searched for a question and found a single SO answer from years back that was my own, with no replies.

        I hope something nice happens to you today :)

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh, that stuff happens all the time. The one that really pissed me off was Microsoft 404-ing basically their entire KB system.

      That thing was standing for so long you could still find Windows 9x stuff on it, and it was glorious.

      Around the time they stopped supporting windows 7, they bricked the entire thing up and started a new system. Overnight, all the Microsoft help article links went dead. Find a good forum post about an issue that you’re having and someone replied with a link to the MS KB saying little more than “this should work” followed by a sea of commenters saying thanks, that worked, but when you follow the link, it goes nowhere.

      What a fucking waste.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      But they’re so innovative! They absolutely aren’t deserving of a massive antitrust lawsuit… /s

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Eh I mean alphabet and Google do have legitimate reasons for antitrust lawsuits, but that’s independent of how shit Google search has become.

          Anyway, for those who are fed up with the terrible results, use Ecosia. I’ve basically never needed to use anything else and the advertising money goes towards planting trees responsibly to rebuild ecosystems.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hah!

      No.

      Soon enough the result will be an AI generated “blogpost”, generated by the search engine, in response to your query.

  • Jezza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This is why I’ve really grown attached to Kagi (paid search engine).

    It’s made the internet usable again. I’m honestly surprised how much of difference there is. I’d really recommend people give it a shot. (there’s a free trial for it)

    • verdigris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Isn’t Kagi an AI company with a bunch of shady shit going on? I’m always extremely skeptical of these posts.

      • Jezza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I never heard anything before this, so I looked around, and there’s definitely some posts about it.

        https://www.osnews.com/story/139270/do-not-use-kagi/

        https://d-shoot.net/kagi.html

        I’ll have to give them a read.

        For now, ignore my recommendation, as I don’t yet fully know my stance on this, with the information provided.

        However, I can say that I’ve been super happy with the search results. I don’t use their email service. Just the search and the access to all of the LLMs that are out there.

      • cschreib@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know what shady shit you’re referring to. They do AI, but I don’t use any of that. IMO their core strength is the search engine and how it works for you rather than against.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Many people would prefer a paid service over an ad supported one.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Many people would prefer that their search history isn’t associated to personal and payment information.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It makes me sad because Google used to be great. The main feature that made Google great was the click rejection. Basically the search would know when you clicked on a link and didn’t come back to the search results. This action would add weight to that result as “this probably has the information that was being searched for” so it would be nearer to the top later when others made similar queries.

    This was their killer feature, it basically crowd sourced the correct information. After a small amount of time, the correct results would kind of float to the top so subsequent searches would put those results near the top to help satisfy queries faster.

    Now? They seem to want to give you results that satisfy their partners, and keep you tied to the results page as long as possible. The focus seems to have shifted from being a good search engine with accurate results, to a meme of how to make money.

    Never before has this shift been more clear to me than right now, directly in the wake of I/O 2024; an event my friends have taken to calling AI/O. Pretty much every single presentation was about Gemini and AI generated garbage, but this isn’t what made Google’s new direction clear to me. In the last 20-30 minutes of the event it was made perfectly clear what they were doing with I/O. And to drive the point home, every I/O has showcased stuff you can’t use yet, stuff they’re working on, and other cool shit. Some of it cost money, but there was usually some stuff that was just done because it could be done and it would be made available at some point, a nontrivial amount of it was free. At AI/O, the entire focus was on AI, with little to no non-AI stuff in there, at all, then at the end, they kicked everyone in the shorts. Here’s our prices to access this shit. Buy it. As far as I’m concerned AI/O was a gigantic marketing circle jerk to sell their AI.

    It seems that Google has entered the final phases of enshittification.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Saw an article that said that some execs demanded for search to have better user retention. I.e make the user search multiple times to find what they’re looking for, so they can be shown more ads.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I can’t wait for this to spread to unrelated areas!

        Supermarkets maximizing profit: put ads everywhere and hide the most commonly bought foods!

        Gas stations maximizing profits: unskippable ads on all pumps, plus the pump stops halfway to make you watch another ad.

        Dating apps: oh… They already killed themselves. Swipe swipe swipe swipe. Hide messages. Hide likes. Reduse exposure to profile unless paid member.

        I hate this future.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Supermarkets maximizing profit: put ads everywhere and hide the most commonly bought foods!

          Many supermarkets already do things like putting the milk and bread at opposite sides of the store, so you have to walk through the whole store to get both. You’d often be walking past the end caps while doing so, which are essentially ads (companies pay to have their products displayed at the end caps)

  • SEND_NOODLES_PLS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I get quite a bit of flak from my colleagues for paying for search, but I kid you not, I don’t regret splurging on a Kagi subscription at all. It’s personally less stressful for me, having to wade through less cruft, and I think I even work significantly faster because of how I use it.

    It’s sad when you think about it. Search was such a good experience in the past.