• Panda (he/him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, this sucks. PayPal was great for only having your credit card information in one place - now it looks like I’ll have to risk it with every website.

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would’ve loved to have a paypal alternative if so many damn services would adopt them.

    And no I’m not talking Google Pay or Apple Pay. They’re just as bad.

    • flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      How is Apple Pay just as bad? I haven’t heard anything that they do like this. There is no advertising in the Apple ecosystem. In fact, several places (like Walmart) don’t want to adopt the tap to pay because for some cards, it blocks tracking from them by using a pseudo randomized credit card number every time. It makes using the rewards for places a pain, but it works at maintaining harder tracking for whoever you’re paying.

    • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, their evil plot finally laid bare. Copy what Mastercard and Visa have been doing since the 80s.

  • exanime@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    So happy I deleted my account with them 5 years ago after going throught their laughably bad customer protection (the only reason I had them to begin with, I had figured it was a good idea to have a buffer between merchants and my CC)

    In the end, it was perfect because, as they refused to help, I went straight to the credit card to reverse the fraudulent charge and closed all accounts with PayPal… Then I get a whiny email from them when the CC took the funds and left them holding the bag… Sweet minor victory

        • exanime@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Correct… In late stage capitalism “innovation” means breaking some laws (Air B&B, Uber), smoke and mirrors (AI) or outright scams (Theranos)

          This is why all these new “innovations” need to flood the market as hard and fast as possible… Before anyone notices what they really are

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Throw enough investor money at lawyers and anything is legal for an amount of time.

            “Oh, I’m sowwy, did we bweak the law? Well here’s 5,000 boxes of paper that say we didn’t, see you in 18 months.”

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      If only it was smart enough. Make its like oh you bought a newtv, you would like this new surround system

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m sure thats the theory, and whats being sold to the ad buyers, but my money is on it ending up like the ads you get after buying something from amazon/ebay: same item you just bought.

        • ramirezmike@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          you probably just notice that because it doesn’t make sense from your perspective.

          it’s probably more cost efficient for advertisers to just throw relevant ads at potential groups. Determining whether an individual already has the item is a waste of resources, and you probably don’t notice when the ads are things you don’t own.

          • CameronDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Last time I observed this I was getting the exact same item that I bought being advertised to me constantly, across multiple sites. No variation at all. It was a pair of hiking shoes. If it had then offered me hiking poles or rain coats or anything else that would have been useful, but instead it was the same pair of shoes I had already purchased.

            If the ad network had actually suggested useful paired items that i dont already own, then those ads should actually stand out, as they are actually relevant to me.

            If its not cost efficient to actually target to the individual (and I dont doubt that it isn’t), im not sure what Paypal is bringing to the table here that Amazon etc can’t already do.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well… looks like I’m going to have to find a new payment platform to use.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Did you not know they’re already selling your purchase data? All the card networks do it.

      That’s why you need to use cash to buy anything you don’t want logged to create a data point about you to be sold

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        For items or just the shop? Because I write EPOS systems for a living, and as far as I can tell, we pass no item data to the credit card merchants.

        The shop is obviously passed to them. So maybe don’t buy from Dave’s Enormous Dildo Emporium.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The card companies can get data from the Merchant Category Code to infer the nature of purchases, without specifics. The stores also have a record of what items you bought, which could also be sold unless you have a contract with the store that guarantees they won’t sell your purchase history (at least in the countries without strong privacy laws)

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s per store though, presumably when they sign up with a payment provider (because there’s a lot of rules about e.g. using credit cards to gamble with).

            If I buy sex toys from Tesco, it’s still showing up as “groceries”. If I buy from a sex shop, it’s going to be more clear cut.

            I can see from my emails that PayPal send out itemised receipts on behalf of their customers, so they’re definitely collecting more data than the big two.

    • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Corpo apps are like

      “Do you love me? Rate 5 stars?”

      No I don’t love you. How about zero stars for sexual harassment? Do I need to talk to HR?

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fucking within like 2 minutes of using their apps too, they ask, “do you like the app?” Then another popup that says, “provide feedback for why you don’t like our app?”

        Because you keep getting in the way of me actually doing what I need to do. And it’s getting uninstalled as soon as I’m done with it.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s to the point where no one wants to do shit on their website anymore. They force you to download the app. So they can get even more access and control of your info. And like I need more motherfucking apps on my goddamn home screens. Fuck that shit.