Tack “&udm=14” on to the end of a normal search, and you’ll be booted into the clean 10 blue links interface. While Google might not let you set this as a default, if you have a way to automatically edit the Google search URL, you can create your own defaults.

    • Muscar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      The idea of it is, but DDG isn’t. I used it for a couple of years but rarely felt it was good enough, I kept having to go back to Google or even Bing or Yandex to get the results I needed. One of my major gripes was it not showing the dates on results, so I never knew if the information was up to date without clicking through to every result and checking it there. Then I kept seeing pretty bad news about it, the company doing stuff people, including me, didn’t appreciate.

      I know some will hate on me for this, but I’ve now used Kagi for about a year and it’s by far the best I’ve ever used. If or when that goes bad I’ll find something else, but right now nothing comes close to giving me both the right results and also giving me control over everything. Of course, there are negatives but that’s the case with everything else too. None of the “bad” news about it has turned out to be even close to as bad as first reported, and the rest is just people hating on it because others say they like it.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Its better than google these days. The results are more relevant and relatively unpolluted with AI shit results than google.

        I’ll use Kagi when my searches aren’t associated with my payment info and presumably other fingerprinting.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        How much are you using search, and for what that DDG results aren’t enough for you?

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Duckduckgo suffers a lot of the same problems as google and other search engines. It’s just not getting progressively worse as fast as google. It’s still been getting worse and worse as time has gone on. I really dislike people who just point to another search engine like it’s the end all be all and don’t or won’t acknowledge that each one has problems and a lot of the problems overlap significantly. None of that fixes the problem or makes any of these companies backtrack on their terrible implementation of anti-user/anti-consumer policies.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        For me it’s worse than Google. About half the time I have to run the search again in Google because none of the DDG links are relevant to my query.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I just wish I could search a term of more than 2 words and get relevant results rather than pages that contain at least one of the words in high volumes. That’s the only reason I ever use google, for years now. Encasing the words in quotes doesn’t seem to function at all on DDG, either.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve found that search engines in general, including Google, really don’t like to listen to the whole thing I typed in.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Google still listens to quotation marks, at least.

          Won’t take it for granted. Has worked for a decade or more but who knows how much longer.

        • beeb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Here are the same queries with Kagi (I was interested to see the difference)

              • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I was gonna ask if your OS displays 🧑‍🧒 in color, or if you were searching a different emoji.

                Less than two hours later, Google forgot how to find the right emoji!

                Regarding my pondering, now I see Emojipedia moved the by-platform Emoji icons to the Designs tab.

                In the meantime I learned Wikipedia redirects 🧑‍🧒 to “Family” :)

                • beeb@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yeah the colors come from the os, my keyboard shows the monochrome one when I pick it. That was all very interesting!

      • vanderbilt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        DDG has had cost issues with some of the more complex queries. Exclusions (-) for example are very expensive, as Bing recently raised their prices. I think this is why search has gotten worse with DDG recently.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        DDG only uses the web indexing from bing. There’s no AI on DDG, and the search result is created by themselves, without MS tracking or fingerprinting.

        • Salix@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          There’s no AI on DDG

          Uh… The settings for AI Chat and DuckAssist are both on by default when you use DuckDuckGo. You can see them in Settings -> AI Features

  • Grangle1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This won’t last long. It’s too public now. Google will find a way to kill it and force their AI on you as much as possible.

    • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why should they? The Web-Filter is a function that Google implemented themselves. It’s not a secret trick or something.

    • ahal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Google’s too smart for that. They know there’s a big backlash against AI in the tech savvy crowd and that it’s bleeding users to competitors. So they offer this escape valve that they know the techies will easily find and use, but which 99% of the population will never even look for. This way they can still push AI on almost everyone while at the same time retain as many disgruntled techies as they can.

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re giving them a lot more credit than is probably warranted. They’ve killed off so many popular things and workarounds that really cost them nothing to leave available for the tech savvy they’ve very much shut down to force people to use the systems they want to push.

        googie hasn’t been tech savvy friendly for a while now

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ok. But what benefit would they gain by forcing people into AI search? That’s not rhetorical, I’m legitimately asking. Are you saying this is just about controlling the experience? Because they already did, and all this is doing is weakening that control. It’s certainly not easier or more cost-effective. They’ll get LLM training data from either interface. The other things they shut down cost them development or maintenance or even just server space, but even if they managed 100% adoption of AI search they’ll still need to maintain their old platform as a data source for the AI and for the below-page results. So what financial incentive do they have to push people to a more expensive, less-liked endpoint for that data?

          • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’ve given up trying to understand what benefit companies like googie get from most of the shitty consumer-hostile decisions they make. You’ll have to ask them when they inevitably shut that down what they get from doing that.

      • wagoner@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Google kills its golden goose search engine and is thought here up be too smart to disable a workaround… I’m doubtful.

        • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          But it’s not a workaround. This Web-Filter is a function that Google offers by choice. It’s in the menu on the search page.

  • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    if you have a way to automatically edit the Google search URL, you can create your own defaults.

    Firefox let’s you add arbitrary search URLs to its list of search engines.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They don’t need to “find” a workaround. They put this there. This isn’t some sorta “hack”, it’s literally a feature Google built into the page. This feature will exist for exactly as long as Google wants it to.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The problem is that they absolutely love to kill things. It’s a matter of when, not if, they’re gonna kill this within the next maybe year or so. I can’t see them keeping this long after all the AI backlash has quelled.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes.

      This is like coming into a thread about Windows and doing the i uSe aRcH bY thE wAy thing

      I don’t use Google but your comment is childish

      • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s perfectly fine to be surprised that people use things. Facebook is still here, I’m surprised. Heck, until the news that ICQ was shutting down, I thought it had been dead for decades.

        What’s really tiresome is comments like yours

        • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you’re surprised that people still use Google to search then I hope you don’t get a job as a statistician 😂

          • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think people will use whatever is the default set in their browser.

            That said, I do all my searching through “AI” that can search for me, sort through 50 pages, and give me the relevant links. Works every time.

        • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think they provide a very reasonable reality check / a bit of reflection. And it sounds like you could use one, if you’re surprised that Facebook still exists.